Are the U.S. moon landing photos true or false?

The main representative is Hamlet, a well-known physics professor in the academic circle. He believes that the basis for the American Apollo moon landing fraud is:

1. The Apollo moon landing photos are purely fake

p>

He calculated the incident angle of the sun based on the shadows on the photos taken when the Apollo 11 spacecraft landed on the moon, and the astronaut activity time, coordinate points and lunar phase cycles on the lunar surface published by NASA. The comparison revealed obvious discrepancies. As he said: "Take the Apollo 11 spacecraft as an example. The moon landing point was Sea Tranquility on the moon, 23.5 degrees east longitude and 0.6 degrees north latitude. The launch time from the earth was 13 GMT on July 16, 1969. At 32:00, the extravehicular activity time on the moon is about two and a half hours, from the 109th hour, 7 minutes and 33 seconds to the 111th hour, 39 minutes and 13 seconds. Through calculation, I found: the incidence between the sun and the moon. The angle is only 6 to 7 degrees, almost close to the horizon. However, the Apollo 11 photo of the American flag on the moon shows that the incident angle of the sunlight is approximately 30 degrees, which is too far. The total time for taking photos of extravehicular activities was just over two hours. The incident angle of sunlight should have only increased by about 1 degree. The shadow angle in this photo should not have been reached until 46 hours after "taking a step" "

2. The video of the Apollo moon landing was filmed on the earth

Analyzing the video of the Apollo moon landing, Hamlet believed: "The gravity on the moon is one-sixth that of the earth. 1. Even fully equipped astronauts only weigh 60 pounds and should easily jump six times higher or six times farther than on Earth. From the video, the astronauts can only jump three to four inches off the ground, no. to one meter away. Isn't this very problematic? Someone replayed these shots at a speed of 2.5 times, and everything was normal, as if the equipment on Earth were jumping at the same speed, height, and speed. Distance and rhythm. If the camera speed is slowed down to one-half, the acceleration becomes one-quarter. Unfortunately, as a result, the astronaut's strength will also become one-sixth. When an astronaut is on the moon, his thighs should be as strong as on the earth."

3. There are no laser reflectors installed on the moon.

He pointed out that the laser reflector was from Apollo. Another strong evidence of monthly fraud. He said: "When the laser beam shines on the moon, it diverges into a large beam with a diameter of seven kilometers. When it is reflected back to the earth, the beam reaches a diameter of 20 kilometers. According to the reflector I saw on the moon, The photo estimates that it is no more than one-fifth of a square meter in size. Okay, now please calculate how much of the original light beam can be intercepted by the mirror according to the optimal conditions, that is, the mirror is completely perpendicular to the beam. And reflected back? This reflected beam has a thickness of 20 kilometers after reaching the earth. Assuming that the cross section of your receiving device is one square meter, how much of the original light is finally received by you? I don’t know. Jump! You will soon learn that the laser reflector on the earth is emitted and received. In fact, the real laser reflector is the moon itself. Due to the long distance between the moon and the earth, the moon itself can achieve mirror reflection.

4. The progress of the Apollo project is questionable

The Saturn V rocket used for landing on the moon is extremely powerful, far more powerful than any modern rocket and modern space shuttle. Why is it abandoned now? ? It is said that even the drawings have not been preserved. How is this possible? In fact, the United States has never built an earth space station. Until now, it does not have a suitable vehicle to send a space station to earth orbit. The modern space shuttle can only put it into orbit once. The Saturn V rocket was developed in the 1960s to send fragmented payloads of no more than 20 tons into the earth's orbit. It is said that it can easily send more than 100 tons of payload into the earth's orbit and push dozens of tons of objects out of the earth's gravity circle. It should be easy to launch a space station. If the blueprints are still available, it should be easy to use modern computer technology and other high-tech improvements to create a more effective and powerful rocket. Why not? NASA argued that the cost of the Saturn V is too high, and it is a lie. Children are okay. From 1967 to 1972, the United States built 17 Saturn V rockets in one go. From Apollo 1 to Apollo 17, it is said that none of the 17 Saturn V rockets failed. A highly reliable rocket that can be built at one time shows that it is not expensive. Why was it suddenly abandoned?

Furthermore, the lunar module is also very problematic. Shooting an object to it? It's easier on the moon, but it's not that easy to launch from the moon. Is there enough fuel to reach the moon's orbital speed, that is, to reach a speed of more than 1.7 kilometers per second? The rocket continued to burn for two days when landing on the moon. Once for thirty seconds, it decelerates out of the lunar orbit and descends, and another for twelve minutes to resist the moon's gravity (I know it is one-sixth of the Earth's!) until a soft landing is achieved. Can there be enough fuel to launch from the moon? The primary fuel of the Saturn V rocket is kerosene and liquid oxygen, while the fuel of the second stage, third stage and lunar landing spacecraft are all liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. It takes up to five days from launch to the moon and back.

In the next few Apollo spacecraft landings on the moon, they stayed on the moon for a longer time. The time from launch to return was as long as eight days. During this period, how to keep the liquid hydrogen as the fuel of the lunar module always super cold? State, this is a very difficult technical problem, but NASA has never said how to solve this problem! ”

In addition, the biggest doubt in the history from the development of the Apollo spacecraft to the successful moon landing is the rapid progress of the project, which was unimaginable based on the national strength of the United States at the time. Especially if It should be noted that it was not until January 1967 that the first Saturn V rocket was developed and just about to undergo its first launch test (i.e. Apollo 1). Unfortunately, it was on the moon landing on January 27 of that year. When the cabin was filled with pure oxygen, a fire broke out due to the collision of wires. It took 5 minutes for the rescuers to open the cabin door. The three best astronauts had been suffocated to death by the highly toxic gas produced by the combustion. Subsequently, an accident investigation was conducted, all hardware circuits of the rocket were redesigned, and many improvements were made to the lunar module. This accident alone delayed the implementation of the lunar landing plan for 18 months. How could it be possible that it would not be until 1969? In July 2018, a successful moon landing was achieved in such a short period of time.

As early as 1965, NASA discovered that the pure oxygen solution for the lunar module had serious safety drawbacks and should not be used. This test proved that in a pure oxygen cabin, sparks from the friction of electrical switches can easily cause fires, and it is impossible to put out the fire. Using pure oxygen can reduce the pressure of the lunar module, and the design is simple. However, for safety reasons, nitrogen and oxygen binary gases are still used. The design. This greatly increases the difficulty of the design, because it requires the use of equipment to control the pressure and ratio of the two gases at the same time. This alone adds one ton of weight to the lunar module.

The question is, why in 1967 did they still insist on conducting pure oxygen experiments in which the instruments were powered by electricity, and had astronauts sit in them instead of ordinary test personnel? Knowing that this is very dangerous, they still forced the experiment, which makes people suspect that the astronauts were murdered because they refused to cooperate and participated in the counterfeiting plan