Which camera lens makes you feel "chicken ribs"?

The scenery shot by this lens is not ideal, and the picture is large but not wide, far less than 16352.8 in Sanyuan. 24702.8 is actually a work head, that is to say, it is suitable for units to use, such as meetings, group photos, leadership inspections or leadership speeches. And the effect is still very good. If it is used in personal photography, making a documentary may be really useful. For families, it is also very good to use this lens to record children's growth experiences, their happy lives and photos on the road. 24702.8 is the most fun time.

There are many kinds of camera lenses, and the lens group is relatively large. Of course, there are also a few lenses that are used less. You will think that this lens design is "chicken ribs" and it is a pity that it tastes tasteless!

Canon series 14mm F2.8

Not to mention how practical this lens is, in terms of price alone, the price of Hong Kong goods has reached tens of thousands, and the Bank of China needs about 12 thousand. Why do you have to pay such an expensive price to buy a fixed focus? Yes, an expensive ultra-wide lens! Don't forget that Canon also has Mirror Emperor 1 1-24mm F4, and the price difference is only three or four thousand. 14mm is somewhat neither fish nor fowl! The image quality of 1 1-24 is quite strong, and the image quality of 14mm is not much different from that of1-24. On the contrary, all kinds of sub-factory lenses with such expensive prices and cheap ultra-wide lenses are completely replaceable! This is even more ridiculous 14mm!

24-70mm F4

16-35mm F4 I can understand that even if you don't use F4 aperture to take pictures of people, it's ok to take pictures of scenery. 70-200mm lens is a bit euphemistic and not very flattering. The advantage of focal length can slightly improve the blurring ability. Although it is not as blurred as 2.8, it is always the best choice for friends with low budget and long focal length! However, the 24-70mm F4 is really uncomfortable. Such a good focal length, but mixed with such an aperture. Professional landscape shooting is needless to say, just like portrait lens. Without a large aperture, it is better to focus. And there is also a lens similar to 24- 105, which is also 24-70mf4. The difference in image quality is not too big, the focal length of 24- 105 is longer, and 24-70mm loses its advantage! The only bright spot is that it can be shot at close range, which can be used as a macro, but it is also a more than enough lens! Really chicken ribs!

Pay attention to "aperture and shutter", and more exciting information is waiting for you!

If you say chicken ribs, it must be 24-70.

This kind of lens often appears in the photo studio or studio, and the things that individuals buy are basically influenced by it.

The focal length 24 of this lens is not wide enough. When you really want to shoot an atmospheric scene of a building or landscape, it's really lacking. The focal length of 70 is even more embarrassing. The lens is not big enough near, and it can't be reached at a distance, so I personally think this focal length belongs to chicken ribs.

In a word-Canon 24- 105.

Let's start with the reason.

First of all, I am a Nikon party. Please hear me out. I won't spray Canon just because I use Nikon. I'm not that radical.

I say this lens is lame because I have used it.

20 1 1 At the end of the year, a friend said that he wanted to buy a camera, and asked me what kind of camera to choose and how much was appropriate.

I said if you are not short of money, you can get a set of big three yuan. I use Nikon, so I suggest you choose Nikon, in case you want to exchange experiences or change lenses in the future, right?

As a result, people don't listen to me.

I bought 5d2,24-105.

Originally, people bought whatever they wanted when they had money, but they didn't listen to me. I don't see anything wrong either. But I'm good with my friends. Tell me when you buy equipment-will you try it on for me?

I said this is a camera, not a car, big brother. The camera can be used directly without running-in. You've dropped to more than 30 thousand, so I'll stay here. Besides, I'm taking pictures of the scenery. What if I tap you on my way out? It doesn't matter if I knock on my own, but this is a new machine. ...

That says it doesn't matter, so you knock. If you really knock, count me in!

I play drums here.

A habit of wearing Nikon's neck and a Canon's 24- 105?

Then someone really sent me ... sent ... sent!

Then this set of equipment played in my hands for more than a month.

Say a few thoughts:

Nikon is really embarrassed to play Canon. If you don't handle it, you won't find it. But there is no denying that the color of Canon is really good.

For me who already has three lenses, the focal length of 24- 105 is really lame. Wide-angle bars are not wide enough, telephoto bars are not long enough, and mid-range bars are not as good as 24-70. ...

If you only have a camera and a mirror, you can consider the coverage of the focal length wide enough in the choice of lens-but the picture quality is second to none! One camera and one mirror should first consider whether it can be shot, and then think about how to improve the content of the work. Continuous shooting can't shoot it, so what are we talking about? Image quality, composition, color? I haven't even filmed it. What are we talking about? Yes!

If you have a big three yuan, then starting with 24- 105 is a waste of money-I said this shot is a chicken rib, and it is also based on the premise that I have three shots. But if you only have a camera and a mirror, 24- 105 is a good choice.

Because every photographer is different.

Yes, we are different.

Chicken rib lens? Yes, whether it is Nikon, Canon, Sony, Pentax and other SLR lenses, there are one or two rib lenses. I think the chicken rib lens is a lens with low utilization rate and few buyers. But I belong to the kind of early adopters, and the first chicken rib lens was born.

Nikon 10.5 fisheye lens

This is a DX lens, because the D300s used at that time just tried this lens. The fisheye lens is very special, and the front of the lens is curved, so the lens cover is buckled instead of the usual flat cover card. The fisheye lens is characterized by a wide shooting range, but the picture is curved. The fisheye lens is actually a very interesting lens, but it is really of little use at ordinary times, just to take it out for fun when shooting scenery. This lens is not expensive, and there are friends who buy it.

Nikon shift lens

Well, this shift lens is really lame. Very expensive, more than 3 yuan. PC 19 is about 2W high school. I believe the person who bought this lens is not an ordinary person. There are also many kinds of shift lenses. At the beginning, the biggest feature of axis-shifting lens is to correct perspective deformation. Ordinary lens will tilt when shooting buildings, so we can adjust and repair the shifting lens to correct the tilted buildings. Now the shifted lens can change the focus and make the real world an illusion.

I think these two shots are lame, but I admit they are both good shots. Because the usage rate is not high, there are fewer people who usually shoot, so few people use these two lenses for creative shooting.

Which camera lens makes you feel "chicken ribs"?

"Chicken ribs" is not obvious, but 50/ 1.8 has been used for a long time. It's neither too long nor too short, and it's very uncomfortable to use. It takes a long time to shoot the whole body, and the composition of the bust is a bit complicated.

Let's talk about why not. When we go out, the picture quality of wide angle+100 micro, 50/ 1.8 is not good, and the focus is still slow, especially in weak light, which is more suspected of pulling the bellows.

Of course, it's good to make a guest appearance occasionally, but it's also good to avoid big backlight when the light is soft.

You can also sweep the street. In order to avoid complicated scenes, the scenes are not grand enough.

Interesting question, let me say one: Nikon 18-300/3.5-5.6 vr version:

It's convenient to see the world with a mirror, but the picture quality of this head is really average, which greatly limits its use value:

First, the focal ratio is too large and the distortion is obvious.

It is really difficult to control the distortion when the focal ratio is large, but such wide-angle distortion is too obvious:

Personally, I think this degree is not too late, and it really has no use value.

Second, the aperture is already very small, but the sharpness is still average.

Taking the wide-angle end as an example, F3.5 and F4 have poor sharpness and insufficient details:

After receiving F 1 1, the sharpness is not much better, but the contrast is not good, and the dark part is a mess:

It's OK under F8, which is the highest quality, and the head is relatively balanced.

The maximum aperture definition at the telephoto end is not high, but the contrast is good (the following parameters are 300/5.6):

Third, the dispersion (purple edge) is not well controlled, especially at the wide-angle end and even at the lower edge of the small aperture.

At large aperture, the dispersion of center and edge is obvious. After receiving F8, the center has improved, but the edge has basically not improved:

In the high light ratio environment, the head will have a purple edge that can't be ignored at the edge of the outline of strong light, which is more obvious in large aperture. The 300 end is slightly better, but not much better:

When the aperture reception is greater than F 1 1, the contrast is obviously reduced, and the use value is not great.

To sum up, the picture quality of this head is not bad except F8, and other parameters are average. Although the price of more than 3000 yuan is not too high for the original factory, it is not recommended to enter this end unless you really care about the convenience brought by the large coke ratio.

Personal opinion, for reference only, welcome to communicate, * * * with the improvement.

In my opinion, the most rubbish and embarrassing shot in Canon history is 24- 105. When the price of nearly ten thousand yuan appeared, I thought it was too rubbish. After loading the fuselage into a camera, it was blown to the sky by a group of stupid dogs. Imaging seconds kill 24-70 2.8, seconds kill focus. In the end, it turns out that my judgment is correct, and the price of a red circle has fallen.

This question has been answered before. Different shooting themes and usage habits will have different views on the same shot, so the following views only represent individuals.

Here are a few shots that have been used by individuals and feel rather tasteless.

1. Canon 14f2.8Lii

The picture quality is good, the volume is good and the distortion is acceptable, but the price is too high and the corresponding utilization rate is too low and limited.

The price of more than 10 thousand yuan, super wide-angle fixed focus, is more suitable for people with more needs. Most people don't recommend it, because you will find it is not as high as 16-35, and you want to sell it. Compared with other red circle lenses, the second-hand price is extremely low and it is not easy to sell.

Second, Sony Budweiser.

Playing Sony label is actually a copy of the previous generation Minolta Budweiser, and I don't like the backward structure of extension.

In terms of price, it is a little cheaper than Canon New Hundred Micro, but it always feels worse, regardless of workmanship or imaging.

A user, it is recommended to buy Minolta Budweiser. The same thing is much cheaper.

III. Canon 24-70f4L

The advantages of this pan-tilt are light weight, small volume, improved imaging compared with 24- 105f4L, and macro function.

However, 24- 105Lii is recommended.

Imaging has improved, but not too much. As a standard zoom lens, it only has a little volume and weight, and it still has to widen the gap with 24-70f2.8Lii, so the macro function is added. But in fact, this macro function is still relatively trivial.

So there will be 24- 105 second generation.

Write these three paragraphs first. Welcome to correct me.

Old horse's point of view answers you.

Many people may be unwilling to answer this question. On the one hand, the lenses bought with money are idle. On the other hand, I am also tightening my belt to buy the next lens.

The reason for this situation is that many junior photographers don't understand their future shooting goals, shooting themes and shooting topics. Just follow the crowd and see what kind of lenses others have. I have to buy one myself. So it caused a lot of lens waste.

Once, I organized a marathon. A photographer with a huge camera bag on his back panted and asked me, Teacher Ma, which head did you shoot this with? Open the camera bag and see, in addition to the big three yuan, there are several fixed-focus lenses.

Answer the question of the subject directly. I make relatively few detours in equipment purchase. At present, the only feeling is chicken ribs, which is a 14 mm wide-angle head. I really feel that it is of little use. Contrary to the enthusiasm when I bought it, I put it on idle fish and sold it.