What are the cameras and lenses of various SLR brands suitable for the poor?

Playing photography may not be poor for three generations, but there are ways to play poor with SLR.

The three mainstream camera brands, Canon, Nikon and Sony (and Pentax, of course, but Pentax's market share has been low, so it is not among the mainstream equipment brands for the time being), if only the SLR brand is used, Sony can be removed, because Sony produces micro-orders and has stopped production of SLR. Canon and Nikon, the top two brands in the SLR industry, have combination equipment of entry-level categories.

So, don't underestimate the entry-level SLR in your hand. Giving full play to one's maximum energy and showing one's photographic talent are the keys to photography. Many people with hundreds of thousands of devices may not be able to make any decent films, but entry-level devices can still make beautiful works. It is not appropriate to focus on equipment in photography.

So, what are Jia and Ni's mainstream poor travel equipment?

First, Canon. Some people think that Canon's entry-level SLR is more cheat people than Nikon's, because the functions and materials are not so good. Indeed, from the appearance and experience, there is such an objective fact. For example, many of Canon's entry lenses are plastic bayonets, but Nikon is mostly metal, and Canon's cameras are light and heavy ... But what Tantaro wants to say is that Canon's entry SLR image quality is not bad, and it will not automatically break without special drop or touch, and Canon's screen resolution and touch performance are better than Nikon's.

Canon's cheaper entry-level fuselage is mainly four-digit, three-digit and individual two-digit SLR models. These models are four digits 1300D, three digits 200D, 800D and two digits 77D. These machines are officially classified as entry-level, and the stand-alone price is cheaper than the fruit mobile phone. Tantaro doesn't recommend buying the lowest four-digit machine, because it is not much cheaper than the three-digit machine, but the control and materials are still too low. Daily use, shooting life scenes, flowers, children, travel photos, three digits is enough.

200D has worse optical focusing, smaller battery capacity, more limited functions and fewer control function buttons, but it is enough for daily use. In particular, if you use screen electronic framing, its focusing speed is no different from Canon's own mirrorless camera and higher-order SLR camera. It also has full-pixel dual-core focusing function, leading focusing function and compact body, which is equivalent to giving you an optical framing focusing system on a single-phase machine without anti-reflection.

800D is superior to 200D in the number of focus points, focusing speed, focusing performance, fuselage control shortcut keys, grip comfort, optical viewfinder, battery performance and so on. And the picture quality is not much different. It is the latest generation CMOS of Canon.

The 77D looks more like a mid-range SLR with two-wheel control on the shoulder screen, which looks more professional, but it is actually an upgraded version of the previous 760D, which is essentially lower in positioning than the real mid-range product 80D. It is more suitable for users who want to study photography in depth and have a higher level upgrade in the future, which can lay the foundation for the use habits of some high-end cameras.

As for the lens, since it is played by the poor, Quan Huafu and the red circle lens will not be considered. Canon has a very good set of entry-level STM lenses with quiet focus and sharp picture. In addition to the small aperture and light color, it is still very easy to use. Although it is not as good as the advanced lens, it is at least light and durable. There is also a very big point of STM lens, that is, shooting video, the autofocus sound is very small, and the focused strokes are very soft. Canon's full-pixel dual-core focus, shooting video is a must.

Daily use 18-55STM, or 18- 135STM, is a set of lenses with common focal lengths, which is very practical. Although the aperture is small and unstable, the focal length is practical and anti-shake, and the telephoto end has a certain macro function, which is a good choice for getting started.

If you want to blur the portrait background, take a small spittoon 50MM F 1.8 stm lens. This 50 mm pan/tilt is only a few hundred dollars, but it also has new focusing performance. 1.8 large aperture, blurring the bust is very good. In some specific cases, the effect of this head actually exceeds that of 50 1.2 bull's head.

There are also two very light biscuit lenses, 24mm and 40mm STM lenses. The lens is very thin, and the camera is like a lens cover. However, it is also used from a humanistic point of view, with close-up ability, and the maximum aperture is 2.8, which is very convenient to carry.

If you need to play telephoto, 55-250STM is a medium telephoto zoom lens, which is not bad. Good definition, fast focusing, much cheaper than the expensive red ring head of the white rabbit, and more portable.

It's ok to play extra wide. The lens of 10- 18STM has been widely praised by foreign photographers. In addition to making the apsc framework feel the ultra-wide viewing angle, the most conscience is that it also has anti-shake.

In the Canon camp, Tantaro thinks that if you don't play well, you can play with the 800D body +" 18- 135 "confocal lens +50 1.8 title for a while, and then consider other focal segments after you have a deep understanding of photography.

Second, Nikon. Nikon's entry-level SLR, as mentioned above, is really kind in both material and function. For example, the practical function of "point measurement linkage" matching focusing and photometry is standard in Nikon, but it is only given in Canon 1D, which is really the kind of Nikon; For example, Nikon's RAW format post-processing tolerance is better than Canon's; For example, Nikon has great advantages in focusing number and accuracy compared with Canon of the same grade, but the live view focusing on the screen lags behind Canon in an all-round way, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Nikon's several quality incidents in recent years have made the already sluggish performance worse. However, Nikon's century-long persistence in manufacturing and researching optical products is a professional quality that other manufacturers do not have, which also gives Nikon a very loyal user base. It is often said that "it's good to be Nepalese", and few photographers have heard of "it's good to be Nepalese". Because Nikon is more focused on the simple original intention of plane photography, and Canon is more willing to develop in many dimensions in electronic functions and videos, this is Tantaro's superficial understanding of these two brands. If you have no demand for video, but are only interested in photography, you can really consider Nikon's products.

Nikon's entry-level models are all four digits, and the grade is determined by the size of the first digit. At present, the models in production are D3400 and D5600 in turn. Among them, the grade at the beginning of 3 is lower than that at the beginning of 5, and the high grade is D7500, which corresponds to Canon 80D and is not entry-level. Nikon cameras are divided into those with body motor and those without body motor. No matter the beginning of 3 or the beginning of 5, there is no body motor, which means that only the lens with lens motor can realize autofocus. Choosing an old lens without a motor can only focus manually, which is very different from Canon. Canon uses lens motors, and all the fuselage has no motor to drive focusing. Both cameras use APSC format cameras with pixel level exceeding 20 million pixels, and both cancel the low-pass filter, which has a better improvement in image quality details. Compared with Canon at the same level, they do have a certain degree of professionalism.

The main difference between these two machines is that the number of focusing points of D5600 is 39, while the comparison basis of D3400 is 1 1. The D5600 has a flip touch screen, but the D3400 does not. There are some minor control differences, which are not major. Therefore, Tantaro's positioning and classification of Nikon is not as clear as Canon's. Of the two cameras, the cheaper D3400 is preferred.

In terms of lens, Nikon lens set is also very practical, whether it is 18-55 or 18- 105, which has been used for many years, or 18- 140 which is now standard on D5600. There is nothing to say about lens kits, but they are all cheaper. Useful time, such as traveling, taking photos, taking meetings, etc. , especially 18- 140, the focal length is very wide and practical.

In terms of medium telephoto, Nikon has a cheap 55-200 lens with moderate price, which is suitable for matching with APSC format.

Playing portrait blur requires a large aperture to fix the focus. Nikon did not recommend Canon 50 1.8 as a cheap title. No, Nikon has a 50 1.8D lens, which is called the essence of human optics. After many vicissitudes, neither of these two entry-level SLR cameras has a body motor. This lens can't focus automatically, and the manual focus ring has poor control feeling, so it is not recommended. 50 1.8G lens has exceeded 1000 yuan, and the viewing angle on APSC is equivalent to 80mm lens, which is not recommended. Tantaro only recommends a humanistic vision, 1.8 large aperture and an entry-level autofocus lens-Nikon 35 1.8G lens, of course, DX version, not FX one. This lens is already at a price below 1000 yuan, and there is no sense of disobedience when the head is hung. It is small, its vision is suitable for humanities documentaries, its aperture is not small, and its resolution and color are not bad. To say the disadvantage, autofocus is a little slow, but it won't feel obvious if you don't deliberately pursue focusing speed.

Unfortunately, Nikon is a professional company that manufactures wide-angle lenses, but it lacks cheap APSC ultra-wide-angle lenses. The matching of ultra-wide lens can only be considered by the deputy factory lens.

For everyday photographers, modern digital SLR cameras have been able to meet our needs, and it is actually unnecessary to blindly pursue expensive and advanced equipment. Before buying equipment, you should first think about the theme that suits you, find the right position and determine the direction, and then buy relatively suitable equipment. The most important thing is to give full play to the performance of these equipment, take a camera to shoot, keep learning and improving, and don't let the equipment become a decoration. In that case, there is no point in high-end equipment.

If you like Canon, I recommend you to enter Canon's entry-level Quan Huafu SLR 6d2 with lens 85- 1.4, which adds up to a maximum of 20,000. Want to enter Nikon, buy an entry-level Quan Huafu SLR d750 or 780, and the lens is also 85- 1.4. The price is similar to that of Canon, maybe a little less, because the price of Canon is relatively high at present.

I like shooting scenery, and I definitely recommend Nikon. Because there has always been a saying in the photography circle: Nikon shoots landscapes and Canon shoots portraits. If you like shooting scenery, of course, I recommend Nikon first. The camera is still an entry-level Quan Huafu d750 or d780, and the lens is 16-35f4.0, which is about 15000. You can totally accept it.

Some people like to shoot birds, but I still recommend Nikon, but the camera is in C format, which is Nikon's classic C format SLR camera d500. Although the price is a little high, it is an artifact to kill birds. Module processors are all d6, which is very clever. I will buy Nikon's 200-500f5.6 camera, which is called poor head. This combination does not exceed 1.8 million yuan, which meets the equipment requirements of the poor.

I have all these, 10000, mostly salted fish. I spent hundreds of thousands of dollars playing with the camera, which really hurt me, but I really like it. I have no choice but to save the country by curve.

Picking from salted fish, I entered several long-awaited scenes. Nikon 17-55f2.8, the legendary tear spot, the original price is about 10,000 yuan, and the second-hand 1670 has a good color. Nikon 80-200 three-generation small steel cannon, Jiao Wai, charming color, original price of several thousand, second-hand one thousand. D200, bright color, original price 1 10,000, 40,000 shutter, from 500 yuan, the battery is a little crotch tied, and it can be used for several years. Instead, I bought a new machine and put it aside to eat dirt. I don't ask for extreme focus, high pixels, just taking pictures, and pursuing image quality and color. This is what I need to play with my camera. I am most happy to know my own needs and do what I can.

Hello, this question is rather vague. There is no standard for the concept of the poor, and whether the "poor" is a novice photographer or an old driver is also a completely different aspect in the choice of cameras and lenses. Personally, if you are poor, which cameras and lenses are suitable for novice and old drivers? If you are a novice photographer, the camera must be an entry-level model. The cheaper the better. For example, the EOS 3000D of Canon brand is the most elementary SLR camera just released by Canon 20 18. At present, the price of a camera with 18-55mm lens is 2600 yuan. 3000d 654.38+0.8 million pixels, focusing at 9 o'clock, ISO 12800, continuous shooting 3 frames per second. For beginners, photography can fully meet the needs.

If I am an old photographer and want to choose a camera, it is more appropriate to choose a second-hand camera. At present, it is more cost-effective to choose Quan Huafu EOS 5D2. At present, the price of the new licensed 5D2 for 24- 105mm lens is around 9000 yuan, less than 5000 yuan except the lens body. If it is second-hand, it will definitely be cheaper.

In terms of lens, people who are suitable for beginners to take portraits can choose EF 50mm f/ 1.8 STM. Although the maximum aperture f 1.8 can be said to be basically unusable, it is not bad to reduce it to 2.8. For a fixed-focus lens whose price is only 600 yuan, it is very suitable for novices to practice their lens sense.

The rest of the poor old driver like me, the choice of lenses is basically to look at second-hand lenses. I can't do more with less money, so I can only buy second-hand lenses. You can choose EF 17-40mm f/4L for landscape shooting, EF 85mm f/ 1.8 for portrait shooting, and EF 24- 105mm f/4L for street sweeping daily shooting. The telephoto lens can be selected from EF-S 55-250 mm.

If people who eat three meals a day are really in trouble, then don't play photography. This requires a lot of brain power, time, energy and money. When the junior players are playing, someone walks into the equipment party. They don't shoot without good scenes, and they all talk with data without good equipment. Therefore, the "dog head" of the junior year does not need to look directly, so he invests a lot in the equipment. Some equipment parties have become equipment museums, not playing with photography, but playing with equipment. There are still some people who are creating. No matter what your head is, my mind is full of ideas. How artistic the idea of putting my own meaning in the picture is! Didn't the great calligrapher use toilet paper to dip in some ink and dance like a dragon and a phoenix to complete exquisite works? As long as there is art in his mind, no matter what tools he uses to express it. Is it still a work of art? Therefore, beginners are advised to know more about the equipment and the significance of photography. As for what equipment the poor use, they can find out in the equipment store and buy as needed. Photography equipment has no end. ...

The mainstream brands of SLR are those two, Canon and Nikon. There are also some brands that are not mainstream or have nothing to do with poverty, such as Pentax and Hasselblad. Pentax and Hasselblad, two non-mainstream, are not suitable for the poor. Therefore, the basic products in into the pit are Canon and Nikon, both of which have comprehensive camera levels, from entry to mid-range to high-end, and there are subsequent professional cameras.

Because the definition of "poor" is not very specific, both entry-level and mid-range models can be included in cameras that poor people can play with.

As for the lens, I suggest that the best combination is a set with a small fixed-focus spittoon, or that it is not needed, and it is made directly by a group of poor people. Let's talk about these cameras and lenses in detail.

0 1 canon low-end camera recommendation

80D is recommended for mid-range models. Although this camera is a 20 16 product, its professional performance is still good, and the price is around 6000.

There are many entry-level models, the newer ones are 77D, 800D and 200D.

The prices of these three machines are all decreasing, and they are all below 5000. Among them, 77D is a model close to a professional camera, 800D is a home camera, and 200D is a mini SLR. Each model has its own advantages and disadvantages, and you can choose according to your needs.

Nikon low-end camera recommendation

Mid-range models recommend D7200, the king of C format, or you can buy the latest D7500, but the price/performance ratio is not very high.

D5600 and D3400 are recommended for entry-level machines, and D5600 is a little more expensive for entry-level cameras. You can buy cameras at corresponding prices according to your own economic budget.

03 lens recommendation

(Small spittoon street shooting)

Because the entry lens products of Canon and Nikon are similar, taking Canon as an example, we recommend two groups:

Combination 1: 18- 135 sleeve +50/f 1.8 fixed focus.

Combination 2: Three Treasures of the Poor (Starting from the Full Focus Plate)

04 abstract

Photography and equipment are the threshold, but the gap between entry-level machines and professional machines is not insurmountable. As long as you have an innovative brain, you are sure to take unusual photos.

Q: What are the cameras and lenses of various SLR brands suitable for the poor?

Later, I became interested in shooting birds. I spent more than 7000 yuan on a Nikon 200-500 lens the year before last. Who doesn't know that 500 sets, 600 sets and 800 sets are all good, but not every photographer can afford tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of prices. Since I am a photographer myself, I actually want to play with this lens, which can meet my requirements. The pursuit of the lens is endless, and what suits you is the most important.

Nikon D8 10 lens Longteng macro.

Two or three pictures taken with Nikon D8 10 lens at 200-500.

Which brand do you choose?

There are not many SLR brands, such as Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Hasselblad, Sigma, Panasonic and Lycra.

Among them, Hasselblad and Leica are high-end routes, Hasselblad has no objection, and the price of SLR is relatively high. There are several models of SLR with hundreds of thousands. Lycra SLR is also more than 100 thousand, with a paraxial axis of 67 thousand.

Pentax, Sigma and Panasonic have a low market share, while Sony mainly focuses on single batteries and miniature single batteries, so the market share of SLR is high, and Canon and Nikon are the main brands with many varieties.

About choosing Canon or Nikon?

This is a common historical problem. Canon powder and Nikon powder can't argue about what to choose. The author can only say that each has its own strengths, mainly depending on personal preferences.

I have used Canon SLR for nine years, which is characterized by fast focusing speed. Canon has some advantages for subjects such as photography that need focusing speed. Nikon SLR has also used a friend's, which is good in workmanship and feels very high. This is an advantage, and the color is full when shooting landscape themes. So later there was a saying that people like Canon and scenery likes Nikon. Choosing a machine also depends on your favorite theme. My suggestion is about Canon or Nikon. Find some photos taken by netizens and see which color you like.

A SLR camera for the poor?

Canon -750d, 800d, 80d, the first two as entry-level SLR, the quality and cost performance are already obvious, and the price of 3000-4000 750d is a good choice.

I have used Nikon -d5300, d5600, d7 100 and Nikon's entry machine d5 100, and their functions are already very powerful. D5300 is enough to get started. If the budget is sufficient, I can consider the other two.

A shot suitable for the poor?

Non-red circle lenses in Canon lenses: 18- 135,18-55,50 are all cost-effective. If you are just a novice, the price of 18-55 and 50 is around 650, but the update rate of 18-55 is too high.

In Nikon lens, 18- 105 is a cost-effective choice. 1000 is more expensive than 18-55, and the focal length is more practical. Much better than 18-55. It can also be equipped with 50 fixed focus, and the price is within 700. I have a high cost performance.

Nikon's high-end lens is more expensive than Canon's, and its workmanship is solid, so personally, I think Canon is more civilian and Nikon's entry quality is better.

I hope the above will help you.

Now the mainstream (in no particular order) brand Canon Nikon Sony Fuji Panasonic Oba, choose SLR and micro-single must choose micro-single. For enthusiasts, if they have sufficient funds and long-term investment, they can choose high-end new machines. If you are playing temporarily or don't want to invest too much, you can choose second-hand. I won't introduce the new machine much. I can do all kinds of evaluation online and buy according to my own needs. The emphasis is on the choice of second-hand cameras. Buying a second-hand camera is similar to buying a second-hand car. Either high occupancy and durability, such as Canon, Nikon and Sony, or choose Panasonic and Pentax with high cost performance. Is there only Fuji? No, you can choose, but Fuji is not as cost-effective as Pentax Panasonic, but it is actually better than them.

Pentax, most of the second-hand SLR can only be selected, and the lens group is mainly old lenses. Pentax: Good color, poor focusing, good control and high cost performance. Recommend second-hand two-digit K series models.

Canon: There are many options for SLR micro-single, with rich lens groups, excellent colors, excellent control and good focus. Second-hand cost performance generally recommends 3-digit SLR or M-series micro-single, and the lens is recommended to be cheap, but the title can be put in several hundred pieces.

Sony, there are many micro-single models, the half frame is mainly 6 series, and the whole generation is 7. Rich lens group, average color, poor controllability, excellent focusing and high cost performance. The recommended model is a6000 6300, followed by a7①.

Fuji is the first choice for micro-single and half-width, and there are many models. The lens group is not very rich, the color is excellent, the control is excellent, the focus is poor, the cost performance is not very good, and the second-hand copy is very high. The recommended sequence is xa3 5 7 series xt-20 30. As for xe series, it depends on personal preference. Personally, I prefer xe series. Also, the x 100 series is not recommended for beginners, because the lens cannot be replaced.

Panasonic Oba, small frame, not recommended. It's not just frame theory. It's just that the same money can buy half a frame. Why bother?

Incomplete and inaccurate, for reference only.

There is no difference between the poor and the rich in SLR, and they are all at the same level. Anyone who can afford a SLR is expensive, because the price is not much different. There are only poor people here, and there are no real poor people!