Fixed focus configuration of landscape photography

Traveling with only one lens, which one would you choose,16-35,50 fixed focus or 70-200?

This is a divergent multiple-choice question. No matter what option you choose, you can get full marks as long as you can say it.

These three lenses have two zooms and one fixed focus, all of which are good lenses.

First, 16-35 zoom lens is a classic in wide angle. The ideal focal length is very suitable for shooting large scenes of natural scenery, and the picture will be broad-minded, magnificent and very imposing, which is the killer weapon of the big scene people.

Second, 50 fixed-focus lens is a sharp weapon for portrait shooting. The lens with a focal length of 50 is moderate, and the imaging picture is very close to the visual effect of people looking at the world and people. The deformation of the picture is very small, and the works are neat and well-behaved, which is very suitable for close-range portrait shooting.

50 fixed-focus lens has excellent imaging quality. In addition to the neatness of the picture, the imaging of the 50-lens is stable, delicate and good in texture, which embodies the imaging advantages of the fixed-focus lens to the greatest extent. Zoom lenses with the same focal length can't be compared with fixed-focus lenses in this respect.

50 fixed-focus lens can take into account the scenery. Many people will disagree that 50 fixed-focus lenses can take into account the scenery. In fact, it is precisely because of the stable imaging characteristics of the 50 fixed-focus lens that it has great advantages and minimal deformation when shooting scenes, especially those with buildings. If you really think the scene is not magnificent enough, everything will be solved by filming.

Third, 70-200 is a good guy who takes care of small scenery and takes portrait shooting as the main thing. Because it is in the telephoto range, you can get a panoramic view of the "small scenery" and also show a certain sense of "space compression", such as sunrise in the morning and sunset at dusk, without which it is not big enough; Using it to shoot portraits can make the shooting distance longer and make the photographer easily avoid embarrassment; Its imaging is very textured and delicate, and it can see through autumn; When its telephoto advantage is given full play, with the use of large aperture, it can reflect a sufficiently blurred background effect.

At this point, the answer is self-evident.

I chose to bring Huawei P30 for the following reasons: First, the post-processing technology of mobile phones is perfect; Secondly, the pixels far exceed the SLR, which is convenient to carry, use and charge; Leica has a 50x super lens, which can be uploaded directly to the cloud. And so on. To tell the truth, 10 I played SLR and finally gave up. First, I spend more and more money on equipment; Second, I have made rapid progress in mobile phone photography technology. The third is the omnipotent post-processing technology of mobile phone software, the fourth is the carrying of very uncomfortable equipment and peripheral supporting equipment, the fifth is the waste of post-processing time of a large amount of electronic waste, and the sixth is the storage space of a large amount of electronic waste. In short, mobile phone photography can basically replace most SLR cameras now. Why do you need to bring bulky equipment? Let yourself relax and be simple, okay? Spend more time enjoying life, why be bound by a lot of heavy equipment? Life is short, I am not a slave of SLR, I just want to record my life with my mobile phone! Do not accept refutation!

Discussion topic: Do you choose16-35,50 fixed focus or 70-200 when traveling with only one lens?

If I can only hang one lens, I will not hesitate to choose 16-35mm lens. The main reason is to consider the convenience of travel and the practicality of the lens.

First, the convenience of travel.

Travel shooting, long journey, walking and shooting. Small lens and light weight are naturally the best choice. At this time, the selection order of the three lenses is 50 & gt35 >；; 70-200。

Second, the practicality of the lens.

Travel photography focuses on shooting landscapes and portraits, taking into account environmental portraits and human portraits. 16-35 >: 50 > 70-200。

To sum up, after 70-200. Although it is an excellent weapon for shooting outdoor portraits, it has poor ability to take into account the scenery; The point is that the lens is long and heavy, and I have to give up.

Then now only 16-35 and 50 sets are left. 50 sets are really small and convenient, but the focal length is not good; Taking it out for a trip will definitely lose too many beautiful pictures I want to be in the camera.

16-35 Among landscapes, portraits, environmental portraits and humanistic portraits, it is not enough to have only pure portraits. On the full-frame camera, images with a focal length of more than 50mm can be obtained by image cropping in the later stage.

In reality, it is still 16-35, and it is perfect to match 50 or 85. After all, the focus is on convenience, which will be icing on the cake!

This discussion topic is a bit deliberately difficult for me, that is, I will talk about my choice when I come. Of the three lenses, I will choose 50 fixed focus first, because my first fixed focus lens is 50 mm

This is a standard lens, and its visual range is neither wide nor narrow. It is more suitable for taking portraits, and it is acceptable to hang a camera when traveling. I like to travel light.

I don't like to carry anything too heavy. The most suitable of these three shots is 16-35, but I don't shoot the scenery of big scenes very much. 50 fixed focus is enough for me.

Choose only one of these three shots to see where to travel and what to shoot. Travelers choose 50 fixed focus like me.

Travel to the south and photograph the city scenery in the south. Landscape and pastoral selection 16-35, and sparsely populated places in the north choose 70-200.

Why did you choose 16-35 to go to the south? Because the buildings in southern cities are relatively dense, ancient towns and alleys, narrow bridges and flowing water space are suitable for large wide-angle storage.

If you bring a 50 in your composition, you will find a dilemma. The roads in ancient towns in the south are relatively narrow. One step forward is water, and the next step may be a wall.

Of course, every shot has its advantages. Fixed-focus lens can make you more diligent, and you will try more ways of composition for a better angle.

Zoom lenses may make you more dependent on the convenience of zooming and lose better composition skills.

If I travel to the northwest, I will choose 70-200, because the northwest is vast and sparsely populated, and the telephoto lens can only play a role in this environment.

For example, it's best to shoot 70-200 shots to the grassland, because the grassland mountains in the distance fluctuate and have light and shadow changes, which is more beautiful than entering the close-up view.

It is impossible to shoot 16-35 for the snow-capped mountains in Tibet and Xinjiang, but 70-200 is suitable for this distant snow-capped glacier.

If I only choose one travel shot from these three shots, I can only choose 16-35.

Judging from these three lenses, they are all excellent lenses, but each has its own professional fields.

50 fixed focus. A photographer needs a lens, but the shooting range is quite wide. Portraits, flowers, humanities and scenery are all competent, but it is not very convenient to shoot scenery, because its focal length is fixed at 50, and the wide angle is insufficient, so it is difficult to shoot big scenes. If traveling is to shoot scenery, it is still not a good choice.

16-35 lens. This lens is made for landscape photography. Its wide angle is very large, which can be integrated into a wider range and visual impact in landscape photography. Because it is a trip, we must focus on the local cultural landscape and beautiful scenery. If you want to shoot some cultural and folk customs of the destination, the telephoto segment of this lens is also qualified to shoot these. This lens has good imaging and image quality. So if it is a travel lens, this lens should be the best choice.

The above is my opinion, and friends are welcome to add or comment.

For these three shots, I'll choose 16-35. At present, the camera I hang every day is 16-35, which can give consideration to both scenery and humanities. 16 can shoot the scenery of big scenes, 35 can shoot the humanities, and I can take a step back and cut the picture as 50.

As far as tourism is concerned, the theme of 50 beats is relatively fixed, and the shooting needs of large scenes can also be solved, but it is more troublesome.

70-200 telephoto travel is generally considered as a supplementary existence, which is not recommended as the main lens, or you deliberately went to a place suitable for this telephoto lens.

The three lenses listed are not suitable for traveling in a single mirror. The focal length is too long or too short, and the standard fixed focal length 50 is not long or wide enough. 16-35 and 70-200 are best. If you can only choose one of the three mirrors, it will be 16-35. If you only bring a mirror, there are three more suitable choices than these three lenses: 1, 24-70, constant 2.8 large aperture, good image quality, but the disadvantage is that the telephoto is not long enough; 2, 24- 105 (Nikon is 24- 120), 4 constant aperture, good scenery and landscape portraits, relatively balanced focal length, aperture and image quality, which is a good choice for travel; 3, 28-300, the focal length is wide enough and long enough, and the zoom is nearly 1 1 times, which is Zhen Jing. However, canon's is not light, and it is a red circle, expensive; Nikon's lens, on the other hand, is light and affordable, and of course, it is not extravagant in image quality.

I happen to have 50, 70-200. If you take a portrait, 50 is the first choice. You are close enough to the person being photographed, so communication is more convenient, and you don't have to worry about tourists crossing back and forth. More importantly, although there is some distortion, the imaging is close to human vision, and the depth of field can be used to create a certain sense of space. Needless to say, sharpness is inexpensive and easy to carry. 70-200 portraits are very impressive, including 85, 105, 135 and other common portraits. Combining aperture and man-machine distance, it can be extremely blurred, but the sense of compression is not generally strong. Taking pictures of scenery and composition can also take pictures of exquisite scenery. But if you take a portrait in a scenic spot, you have to avoid the crowd, otherwise you really need patience.

These three lenses are excellent lenses with outstanding features and professional expertise. If you must give up, you can only choose this 16-35 lens. This lens is made for landscape photography. Its wide angle is very large, which can be integrated into a wider range and visual impact in landscape photography. Because it's a trip, so hang up lightly. This lens is the best choice. Visiting the beautiful scenery will focus on the local cultural landscape and beautiful scenery. If you want to take some folk close-ups of destinations, the 35 focal length of this lens can also be competent for these lenses. This lens has good imaging and image quality.

Why do you have to limit yourself to only one? I'm traveling now, and these three are with me at the same time.

One shot wide-angle, one shot close-up and one shot dark light, each with its own uses.