Which is better, Canon 5D2 or Sony a900?

These two cameras on the first floor must not have been carefully compared. As everyone is used to it, let me say two words:

1: 5D2 is definitely not as good as A900 in positioning and grade. Professionally, the two machines are the same. These two cameras are of the same grade. But at present, they are all market-oriented.

The main advantage of 2: 5D2 is Canon's huge user base and customer base. The key is the user group, and the exchange meeting is very convenient. Especially with this kind of camera, you will definitely consider participating in activities and exchanges. At this time, the advantage of 5D2 is quite obvious! ! It may even be concluded that the A900 is not good because people around it are irrational. But this is wrong.

The main disadvantage of 3:5D2 is cost performance. The machine itself is more expensive than A900 1K, and the price/performance ratio will be worse after adding lens group and lamp. For example, Sony Xiaobai (70200G) is about 4K cheaper than Canon's rabbit (although powder C will say that the anti-shake effect of the lens is better than that of the fuselage, it is not so expensive). In addition, taking portrait photography as an example, the price of Sony/KOOC-0/35/KOOC-0/.8 Zeiss lens is around 9000, while the price of Canon 85/KOOC-0/.2L actually reaches an astonishing/KOOC-0/5000. (So many people who use Sony will buy 135 1.8 Zeiss, but most Canon users still use small white to shoot portraits). The result of my calculation is basically three yuan. With a lamp and a fixed-focus portrait, the two sides can open the gap of about 654.38+00,000.

I would like to add here that considering the user base and loyalty of 5D2. If you participate in more photography exchanges, the price/performance ratio is not so bad. After all, choosing 5D2 depends on your personality, and your personality is good. Borrow a lens from your photographer. For A900, you can't borrow a good lens, can you?

Main advantages of 4: A900: First, the picture quality. Under ISO800, it is basically A900 seconds and 5D2. Under ISO400, the most commonly used ISO, 5D2 wants to achieve the effect of A900. Basically, it depends on PS. A900 is the king of all SLR cameras at present, and 1D3 is no good! Second: the fuselage is anti-shake. This function is equivalent to improving the cost performance of the whole series of lenses, and we must seriously consider the second: lens quality. Comparing lenses of the same specifications, such as imaging with a large ternary ratio, Canon still washes and sleeps. . . .

Main disadvantages of 5: A900: First, the lens group is incomplete. Although Zeiss's pan/tilt and five G lenses are extremely sharp, the tigers and wolves don't fight each other, and many focal lengths are not available (for example, 50 lens, 180 lens, 200 lens, fisheye zoom, shifting axis, and ultra telephoto lens above 400mm, Sony can't). Second: there is no video shooting and live view function, which is very inconvenient.

6. Comparison of details between the two sides: 5D2' s strengths are high sense and live view, which is very intimate. Many people use shoulder screens to talk about things. In fact, I think the shoulder screen is a detail, or more of a habit problem. But the shoulder screen of 5D2 is really good. A900 has a long focusing time (A900 is obviously better in both accuracy and accuracy, and A900 has definitely not been used in 1 building) and continuous shooting. The frame of A900 is better than that of 5D2, but I think it is a habit with shoulder screen. It basically cancels out. The metal fuselage of A900 feels better than 5D2, but the top of the machine is designed as a diamond, which is easy to be injured. As for the high sense, the A900 high sense is not so good-this machine is the largest, and it is also often said that the short board! But objectively speaking, considering the advantages of low image quality and focusing on continuous shooting, this shortcoming is still tolerable.

I bought a 900 for 5D2. Obviously have a say. In addition, 5D2 entered A900, mainly because of Sony's 135 F 1.8ZA lens. If Canon's lens group is wolves, then this lens is a tiger. At the level of10,000 yuan, it has a nearly perfect performance. Although there are many Canon lenses, none of them are as sharp as those commonly used.