Which is better, SLR or micro-single?

Which to buy, micro-single or entry-level SLR?

Micro-orders are not recommended:

1. It is said that the micro-single is portable, and the body is a little small, but the lens is still much larger than the card. The size is limited compared with the entry-level SLR, and the weight is even greater than the entry-level SLR. Portable is a gimmick.

2. It is said that the micro menu is easy to operate. Some of them have been used. I tried NEX five. It's easy to use a camera for a fool, but I want to operate it manually. This menu is called a complex menu with only three or four buttons. It's too much trouble to realize manual operation. The survey also indicated that the menu of micro-menu manually set by users was very inconvenient. If you want to be a fool, just buy a card machine.

Be cautious about getting started with SLR:

1. Remember: the photos taken by camera professionals must be professional! If you don't learn photography, don't think about buying a SLR to make a good film. That's impossible! In order to cater to the hobbies of ordinary users, the card machine usually exposes color distortion, but the photos appear brighter. However, in order to meet the requirements of professional users for color reproduction, auto is generally dimmed directly, which requires manual setting or post-correction. It's really not as good as a card machine without photography foundation.

2. Many people spend 80% of their budget on the body of SLR, or simply buy a set of machines. SLR burning money is not a legend. The investment in taking out a good lens is far greater than the fuselage, as well as tripods, filters and flashlights. It is better to buy a professional card without long-term psychological preparation. The nose of the SLR machine is a bit like the original tire of the automobile factory. The emphasis is on reducing costs, not on using effects.

As a novice, I have no knowledge base and willingness to learn photography, and I am not prepared to invest money and time for a long time. It is recommended to consider a professional card machine, which has higher image quality than ordinary card machines, quasi-professional manual function and portability. You can look at Panasonic LX5, Nikon P7 100, Canon G 12\S 100V, Olympus XZ- 1 and so on.

Which is better, a micro camera or an entry-level SLR?

Hello!

With more than 20 years of photography experience, I personally think that SLR is definitely better than micro-single!

Microfilm is a photographic system developed in recent years, which tries to perfectly combine the portability of the camera with taking high-quality photos. However, the micro-single system is not very mature at present, and the supporting lenses are limited. After the development of 135 years, the 135 SLR system is now very mature, with rich lens groups and complete accessories. Moreover, the entry SLR is getting smaller and smaller, like Canon 100D, which is said to be the smallest SLR camera in the world at present. You can look at it online.

As for the choice of SLR digital camera brands, only Nikon and Canon, other brands need not be considered. Because these two brands are traditional camera manufacturers, they have a long history and are among the best, and their products have high credibility. Although Canon is higher than Nikon in market share, it is neck and neck in quality. As for which brand to choose, the key is which brand's imaging style you like. Canon's imaging is soft and delicate, and Nikon's imaging is sharp and saturated (I personally prefer Nikon and use Nikon cameras, and the scenery is good).

If you are a photographer, just choose a camera first, which can basically meet your daily shooting needs. After getting familiar with SLR cameras, you can update high-end cameras, which may be cheaper. Digital products are updated quickly, so don't try to do it in one step. Buy new products instead of old ones when choosing (the reason is very simple, with the development of science and technology, the performance of new products is much higher and the price is not so expensive, especially for entry cameras). For example, the entry-level SLR Nikon D3200 and D3300 sets (18-55mm) are good, and the Canon 700D sets (18-55mm) are also good, which are the first choice for entry. The price of the kit is around 3000-4000. D3200 is more cost-effective, and the current price is around 3000 yuan, which is very worth starting with. If you want a higher grade, you can choose basic sets such as Nikon D5300 and Canon 60D, and the price is around 5000-6000. The performance and parameters are similar to the former, but the maneuverability is slightly better.

You can look at these websites and compare them according to what I said above: 1. Yi Rui. Com: a well-known website of photographic equipment in China, with comprehensive camera introduction and high reliability, you can know the latest equipment prices. 2. the color shadow is infinite. Com and hummingbirds. China's famous comprehensive professional photography website. From equipment review, netizen evaluation, photography knowledge, photography works, etc.

I hope my answer is helpful to you.

What is the difference between micro-single and SLR?

Hello!

With more than 20 years of photography experience, I personally think that SLR is definitely better than micro-single!

Microfilm is a photographic system developed in recent years, which tries to perfectly combine the portability of the camera with taking high-quality photos. However, the micro-single system is not very mature at present, and the supporting lenses are limited. After the development of 135 years, the 135 SLR system is now very mature, with rich lens groups and complete accessories. Moreover, the entry SLR is getting smaller and smaller, like Canon 100D, which is said to be the smallest SLR camera in the world at present. You can look at it online.

As for the choice of SLR digital camera brands, only Nikon and Canon, other brands need not be considered. Because these two brands are traditional camera manufacturers, they have a long history and are among the best, and their products have high credibility. Although Canon is higher than Nikon in market share, it is neck and neck in quality. As for which brand to choose, the key is which brand's imaging style you like. Canon's imaging is soft and delicate, and Nikon's imaging is sharp and saturated (I personally prefer Nikon and use Nikon cameras, and the scenery is good).

If you are a photographer, just choose a camera first, which can basically meet your daily shooting needs. After getting familiar with SLR cameras, you can update high-end cameras, which may be cheaper. Digital products are updated quickly, so don't try to do it in one step. Buy new products instead of old ones when choosing (the reason is very simple, with the development of science and technology, the performance of new products is much higher and the price is not so expensive, especially for entry cameras). For example, the entry-level SLR Nikon D3200 and D3300 sets (18-55mm) are good, and the Canon 700D sets (18-55mm) are also good, which are the first choice for entry. The price of the kit is around 3000-4000. D3200 is more cost-effective, and the current price is around 3000 yuan, which is very worth starting with. If you want a higher grade, you can choose basic sets such as Nikon D5300 and Canon 60D, and the price is around 5000-6000. The performance and parameters are similar to the former, but the maneuverability is slightly better.

You can look at these websites and compare them according to what I said above: 1. Yi Rui. Com: a well-known website of photographic equipment in China, with comprehensive camera introduction and high reliability, you can know the latest equipment prices. 2. the color shadow is infinite. Com and hummingbirds. China's famous comprehensive professional photography website. From equipment review, netizen evaluation, photography knowledge, photography works, etc.

I hope my answer is helpful to you.

Which is better, micro-single or entry-level SLR?

If you calculate the image quality, there is no doubt that the fixed-door SLR will win, but if it is convenient and beautiful, the micro-single is a good choice. However, the 550D is not very heavy. It is recommended to enter the SLR. If you plan to enter the micro-order, you'd better not enter Samsung. Samsung's technology is relatively immature. Sony's machine is good now. Generally, the micro-single is only used as an auxiliary machine.

Which is better, micro-single or SLR?

As far as the imaging quality is concerned, it is of course a strong SLR.

But to be honest, the difference in image quality between micro-single and SLR is not obvious. There is no need to enlarge the picture from 100% for comparison, is there?

According to the landlord's request, as a resident, I don't plan to upgrade the lens. If I pay more attention to the imaging quality, I still recommend micro-single.

1. The picture quality is incomparable. 2. Micro-single and light. 3. The landlord looks at the most elementary SLR of Canon and Nikon, and does not put the lens in the later period, which is no better than the micro-single.

So I suggest that the micro-single, not necessarily Olympus, can consider Sony's NEX3, which is very good.

Canon says SLR is better than micro-single.

SLR cameras are indeed more comprehensive than micro-cameras. From the structural point of view, the micro single camera is a simplified, lightweight and fashionable design of SLR cameras. A SLR camera consists of a head-up pentaprism (or similar pentaprism) viewfinder, a high-speed curtain shutter, a mirror box, an image sensor, a data processing circuit and a metal body. Can meet the environmental protection requirements of professional photography. Micro-cameras generally omit the pentaprism viewfinder, and the technical rigidity index is weaker than that of SLR cameras.

Is it better for beginners to buy micro-orders or entry-level SLR?

Introduction to SLR recommended:

Canon 650D 18- 135MMSTM package machine.

Canon 600D 18- 135MM and 18-55MM sets of machines.

Nikon D5 100, D5200 18- 105MM, 18-55MM sets of machines.

If you are not in a hurry, you can also wait for Canon 700D 18- 135MM and Canon100d18-135mm sets to go on the market!

If you buy a SLR camera, you don't need any investment later. If you invest, such as flash and medium telephoto lens, you can only say that these entry-level cameras will further improve their performance. In fact, the micro-single is the same!

As far as image quality is concerned, micro-single contrast is much better than single contrast! Those with poor handling are even farther away.

Novice, buy a SLR or a micro-order?

If you are interested in more exquisite photography and don't care about size, then choose a SLR. At present, the image quality of micro-single is still almost poor, and the advantage is very small. Compared with micro-single, SLR is actually not complicated. Whether you buy a SLR or a micro-order, you need to learn some basic photography knowledge.

It is recommended to learn basic knowledge including: aperture, shutter, focal length, ISO, composition, lighting, etc.

As far as the model is concerned, don't buy anything too expensive for beginners. At present, there are about 6000 lenses on the market for you to use (set up cameras), which are suitable for most shooting places, so you don't have to bother to match lenses until you use them. After another stage, you will naturally know what kind of lens you need. As for brands, Canon and Nikon look at your preferences for brands, and they are almost the same.

Finally, after buying a camera, you must read the instructions carefully and be familiar with various functions. That's all that matters. Manual is your best teaching material.

About 5000, which is better, micro-single or SLR?

Tall people are SLR, petite people are micro-single. Requires high image quality and needs a SLR. SLR recommended Pentax K-50 sets (L 18-55mm WR, L50-200 mm WR) of about 4700 yuan, and micro-single recommended Sony ILCE-5 100 sets (16-50mm, 55-2/KLOC-0).