Is the SLR camera Canon or Nikon?

It will be 2020 soon. So, the current digital SLR camera, Canon or Nikon?

Let me talk about my experience and thinking in detail:

As far as landscape photographers are concerned, Nikon D850 is more popular than Canon's competing product 5DS.

Nikon D5/D6 can still be used for many years, but this mode is not what most ordinary people and photographers like. After all, it's a camera used by the news media, so it's meaningless to use it for landscape photography and portrait photography in syrup.

First, Nikon's digital SLR is gone, and there is no future.

This industry is basically like this.

Nikon itself has made such a statement and practice, and Nikon intends to give up almost all the digital SLR product lines.

For the old users of Nikon, many models of Nikon are still worth buying.

However, for Xiao Bai, a novice with zero foundation, it is really not recommended to get into Nikon.

Second, landscape photography enthusiasts, zero-based entry, should first choose high-pixel digital micro-single.

For Nikon's old users, Nikon D850 is still very valuable to buy.

However, for a novice like Xiaobai who has never used a Nikon SLR lens, I really recommend Nikon Z7 and Sony A7R3/R4 if he has a fever.

Don't buy a new Nikon D850 just because you are an old Nikon user. Therefore, I recommend Nikon D850 to Xiaobai, a real novice from scratch.

Third, Nikon digital SLR, the general trend has gone, for the following reasons.

1, Nikon digital SLR, LCD autofocus performance, too bad. However, the LCD autofocus performance of Canon digital SLR is OK.

2, Nikon digital SLR, almost no one wants to buy it as a camera. However, there are also many people who buy Canon SLR for camera shooting.

3. Nikon's market has not been good in recent years, and its sales volume has fallen too seriously, and it has been unable to maintain such a huge system of SLR.

Nikon gave up by himself, not others.

Fourth, for self-media users, Nikon has basically been out.

As far as media users are concerned, the main object of purchase is APS digital micro-sheets with reversible LCD screens.

However, the z50 of Nikon APS is also wonderful. It is estimated that no media users will like it, let alone the cost performance.

This piece comes from media users and is currently the world of digital micro-singles of Canon and Sony. There are basically no other manufacturers.

For home users and literary women, Nikon is basically out.

Because Nikon only has high-end models now.

Nikon has been eliminated from the low-end models.

What's more, Canon's cost performance is first-class, Canon's operation is simpler and easier to use, and its direct color is better.

Six, for small and medium-sized enterprises, primary and secondary schools, e-commerce, Nikon basically out.

Because Nikon's digital SLR is really hard to shoot.

Canon APS digital SLR, high cost performance, photography can be considered.

In the field of publicity photography, Canon is the first and Sony is the substitute.

Seven, Nikon digital SLR, now only two high-end models support.

1, Nikon D850 is really a cost-effective model for landscape photographers.

2. Nikon D5/D6, which is used by many news media anyway.

To sum up, although once, Nikon and Canon were often three to five years ahead.

However, it is almost 2020, and Nikon SLR system is almost impossible to have any hope.

So, at this time, you ask Canon or Nikon which digital SLR is better?

There is no doubt that Canon has an absolute advantage.

Even Nikon D850 and D5/D6 still have an advantage over Canon's competitors.

However, Nikon, which lost the low-end market, can't really compete with Canon, which has a complete system.

Nikon Canon cameras are very easy to use, and the photos taken are very effective. The lens groups are all equally rich. But there is still a difference.

Nikon D750 and Canon 5D3, full-frame cameras of the same grade, used the same morning and found that they were tired and their right hands were uncomfortable. It turned out that Canon's fuselage design was unreasonable and its feel was too shallow. Nikon fuselage is more comfortable to hold. And looking back at the photos, Canon cameras are inconvenient-there are no up, down, left and right buttons of Nikon cameras. Canon doesn't have iso shortcut keys, so it takes a long time to find settings to improve ISO both outdoors and indoors.

Canon lenses of the same grade are more expensive. Low cost performance

Before answering, let's look at a simple fact:

First of all, we should understand that we need not only cameras, but also lenses. The camera, lens and other accessories form a system. Due to the incompatibility between different brands (lens bayonet, flash, accessories, etc. ), choosing a brand is actually a choice system.

So if you already own a certain brand of products, such as lenses or flashlights, then choose the camera of the same brand. If you don't, but most of your friends are using a brand's products, you might as well choose the same brand, so you will have more communication opportunities.

If none of the above is true, there are some subtle differences between Canon and Nikon:

1. Generally speaking, Nikon's low-end lens is more realistic (especially the new lens). For example, more exquisite workmanship and more complete accessories.

Generally speaking, Canon's top lenses are cheaper. For example, Big Three Yuan (3 top zoom lenses).

Generally speaking, Nikon's flash system is more interesting. Flash master joe McNally and flash master David Hobby are Nikon users.

Canon camera can switch almost all lenses, including those 60 years ago, and of course Nikon lens.

6. Nikon D2/D3 model is a purchasing machine of NASA, serving in the International Space Station.

Finally, the debate between Canon and Nikon is an argument with no clear answer, but there is a correct answer that suits your personal shooting style and preferences. Remember, more important than the brand in front of the camera is the people behind it.

What is the best way to invest in a brand? At least, go to a camera shop. Take Nikon, adjust some controllers and see how the camera feels. Then, do the same thing with Canon. A better choice is to rent it and shoot it with each camera for a few days to see which one suits you. Of course, there is a cost in leasing, but considering that once you commit to a brand's lens investment, this is the lowest cost.

No one can compare with the human brain behind the camera!

In fact, Canon doesn't care about Nikon SLR cameras. They are all big brands, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. It's just my own operability. If I prefer the handling of Canon camera, I choose Canon. If I like the handling of Nikon camera, I choose Nikon. Canon's style color will be softer, and Nikon's camera's style color and sharpness will be softer and harder. In terms of lens, Canon EF lens full-frame machine and half-frame machine are basically common, but half-frame machine EF-s lens cannot be used on Quan Huafu machine. Nikon lens and Nikon SLR have always used Nikon F bayonet, so from Nikon's first SLR lens to the latest one, it can be used on the latest Nikon fuselage. (The new machine can be compatible with the old lens, but the old machine can't be compatible with some new lenses, such as those without aperture rings), so not all Nikon lens mounts are the same.

These two cameras occupy a certain market in China and have a certain reputation, which is better or worse, which can be said to be neck and neck. At the same time, this question cannot be answered and judged at will.

Which brand you say is good is equivalent to advertising to others for free. Your hard work is not a penny, and this product may make a lot of money because of an article or a paragraph. Maybe you think it is a little stingy to say this, but if you look at the formal media, especially the TV media, the host will not easily mention the name of a brand product. Brand images appearing in pictures are often coded. Anything that can appear on the screen costs money and is very expensive. In the conventional picture library, the product picture will erase the trademark.

But you can't say that a product is not good. The product image is protected by law and cannot be slandered by others at will. Irresponsible arbitrary judgment, that is a lawsuit. Don't talk nonsense unless you have definite evidence to prove that this product is problematic, inconvenient to use or may bring harm to users. One example is that a certain brand car couldn't stop at the high speed during the Spring Festival last year.

In addition, judging a product casually will mislead consumers. To measure the quality of a product, we not only need to test it in practical application, but also need to conduct scientific demonstration in the laboratory. The judgment we usually give about a product often comes from hearsay. For example, "a camera is red, a camera is yellow", "a camera takes pictures of people, a camera takes pictures of scenery", "a lens is a dog's head", "a lens will lose focus" and so on. Have you really used all these cameras and lenses? Have you ever bought a camera lens for tens of thousands of dollars? Only professional and authoritative testing institutions can test all kinds of cameras and lenses, and it is impossible for these institutions to judge at will.

In fact, the current camera technology has been highly developed, and both cameras and lenses can fully meet our requirements for shooting high-quality pictures. In the fierce market competition, brands that can survive are also based on their own technical strength and product quality. What we need to do is to make a smarter choice in cost performance and service.

They are all big brands. They're all fine. See which one you like.

Nikon's cmos design ability is very strong now, so the dynamic range and color depth of photosensitive elements are good.

Canon has a large number of users in China, and Canon's color reproduction has optimized the Asian skin color. Nikon, on the other hand, optimized European skin.

In terms of sales volume, the sales volume in Europe is also very obvious. Nikon & gt Canon is Canon & gt Nikon in Asia.

If you shoot architecture, I suggest Canon, because the price of Canon shift lens is more intimate and comprehensive.

The diameter of Canon ef bayonet is larger than Nikon F bayonet, and the flange distance can be better controlled. Therefore, Canon has f 1.2 pan/tilt, while Nikon can only achieve f 1.4.

At present, Nikon has changed the Z-mount, and the flange distance is dominant, so it can be used as f0.95 lens.

I use both Canon (1dx) and Nikon (d850). I may have worked abroad for a long time, but that doesn't mean Nikon is better. It's just my habit.

As the two giants of global digital cameras, Nikon and Canon have performed well in the industry. We can only say that Nikon completely defeated Canon in the film era; In the digital age, Canon started earlier than Nikon and was once suppressed. It's hard to say who is strong and who is weak now. The two should be equal.

From the player experience, Canon cameras are more in line with our aesthetic standards in terms of optimized design and algorithm, so the skin color of characters is more delicate and the tone levels are richer. Therefore, there is a saying that "Canon is the first choice for portrait shooting", which is why most photo studios and studios are equipped with Canon. Canon's design has also brought some problems, such as the relative reduction of the sharpness of photos, which is what players say, "the photos are a little fleshy."

Nikon, on the other hand, has bright colors and sharp edges, but the portrait is slightly yellow. So the conclusion is that if you mainly shoot portraits, Canon will be more suitable, and if you mainly shoot landscapes, Nikon will have a better performance.

In addition, in view of the fact that photos have to be retouched in the later stage, it is not the main contradiction to talk about color directly, so there is another important factor in choosing a camera: "Which hand feel do you like?" Canon and Nikon's fuselage function key design and operating system have their own advantages, and the subject can go to the physical store to experience it. At the same level, no matter which one you choose, you can't go wrong.

Finally, if the main body is considering Canon 5D4 and Nikon D850, then go to 850. Nikon D850 is known as "the strongest digital camera in 135", which really deserves its name.

I'm sure Canon is very good,

I've been using Nikon,

Now Nikon is a two-camera mirror.

Canon is good-it can be operated with one hand,

I use Nikon. I like to operate with both hands.

Canon's good girl immediately saw the camera LED wow,

You took a good picture,

I like the reducibility of Nikon when I use it.

…………

This movie is not very good,

I still use Nikon,

Canon is better,

Don't trust Canon advertisements.

…………

Each has his own merits. In the case of one-to-one lens parameters, there should be little difference. As for the color, you can adjust the white balance. Just look at the details of the same level. Therefore, as long as the economy allows, there is a lot of room for choice. But the average family can choose the machine from a few years ago. Then the price will be much cheaper. It's not necessarily new. Machines that have been tested by the market are the most suitable.