Nikon 18-55 lens, ready to change to 18- 105 lens, is it meaningful?

1: If only the focal length is considered, then instead of 18- 105, use 70-200 or 70-300, and the focal length will be more complete and longer. Imaging is also better than 18- 105.

2. If it is used for tourism, it is convenient to "visit here". Then it is still necessary. Otherwise, carrying a large lens is very heavy, and it is very inconvenient to change the lens, especially when the environment is not good, such as the seaside, there will be dust entering the camera.

=========================

Tibet, what a beautiful scenery! It's a pity to use 18-55! It's a pity to use 18- 105! Mainly the picture quality is not ideal! But as a nostalgia, this is enough.

If it were me, I would use 18-55+70-200. Take personal preferences into consideration when shooting good works!

If it's just a tourist shoot, then 18- 105 is very suitable. And 18-55 is very inappropriate. Travel is not enough.

Don't want to carry the camera, then it's just ... hehe. . So you already have the answer yourself.