The aesthetics in different stages are different, so how can we avoid taking the non-mainstream road?

Photography or photography, because the final result of your expression is a photo. Photography is no longer photography, because the photos at this stage are just the carrier of your thoughts. In other words, without photography, you can use installation art, painting, performance art and so on to express your views. What the photographer took above, he named "meaningful form", you can understand that it can be done, you can also understand that it is to express some ideas, and of course it can be what you call non-mainstream.

Like this, it's very good. Through pictures, we can see something you think is special. From your point of view, his purpose is not only to express beauty, but also to make ordinary people understand it on the surface.

After reading your idea and theirs, do you understand the difference? Then, let's talk about bystanders and parties.

Second, bystanders and parties.

We took a photo, maybe a selfie, maybe a work we created. As long as you want to be exposed and exposed, then someone will definitely comment on the interaction, whether it is good or bad, you have to accept it. Why? Because at this stage, you are thinking from the perspective of a bystander.

Why is it that top photography works are put on the internet, but there is no small fresh nine squares for praise exposure? In other words, high praise = good work, low praise/bad review = poor work. Then, under the guidance of such creation, the information you can get and the way to see problems are to go downstream and cater to the public; The end result is more like a commercial photographer and more like some high-traffic photographers on the Internet. You ask them what photography is? It's just a way to cater to the public and make money. What is creation? It has little to do with them, because those creations are hard to be appreciated by the public.

Then let me talk about you. Now you stand on the dividing line between bystanders and parties. What you have to think about is not who you want to cater to, but what you want. Seeing the previous problems, I want to express some contents and infiltrate some thoughts with these contents. Then you are the party at this time, and the reason, process and result of the matter (the connotation of the work) are only clear to you. As for what you like? Comments? What has nothing to do with you, what you understand naturally, and what you don't understand naturally don't understand.