The higher the pixel of wedding photography photos, the better!

The pixel of wedding photography is one of the most important indicators to measure the performance of digital SLR cameras.

The pixel of wedding photography refers to the resolution of digital SLR camera, which is determined by the number of photosensitive units on the image sensor in the camera. One photosensitive unit corresponds to one pixel, so the larger the pixel, the more photosensitive units there are, and the greater the corresponding cost. The image size of a digital SLR camera is determined by the pixels of a wedding photo. The larger the relative, the higher the resolution of the photo, and the larger the printable size without reducing the printing quality.

Usually, the specifications of digital SLR cameras include two parameters: the maximum pixel and the effective pixel. The value of the highest pixel is the real pixel of the photosensitive device, including the non-imaging part of the photosensitive device; Effective pixel refers to the pixel value that really participates in photosensitive imaging. So when you buy a digital SLR camera, you only need to refer to the effective number of pixels.

Early digital SLR cameras had only 2.6 million pixels. With the development of technology and the improvement of technology, the number of pixels of digital SLR cameras is also upgrading year by year. At present, the effective pixels of low-end digital cameras in the market generally reach more than 6.5438+million pixels, and the pixels of top professional digital SLR cameras reach more than 24 million pixels. It can be said that the digital SLR cameras currently on the market can fully meet the needs of photographers and even most professional photographers from the perspective of shooting pixels. Whether the pixel of wedding photography is as high as possible has always been a topic for many photographers. Indeed, the higher the pixel, the higher the resolution of the photo. However, if large-scale printout is not needed, too high pixels are actually unnecessary, and it also increases the cost of storage and post-processing. Some people think that high-pixel photos provide a wider range for post-cropping, but I think this is not as effective as improving composition.