Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Are all artists sloppy?

Are all artists sloppy?

No, I'm not an artist, but my university teacher should be. Although most of my male teachers have long hair, pigtails or strange clothes, I don't think they are sloppy, just look sloppy. Maybe in the eyes of ordinary people, men have short hair, or small heads are more acceptable, or they look neat. Then the man with long hair looks sloppy. Actually, it's not. This also varies from person to person. My teachers are all artists, some like photography, some like leather carving, some like painting, and some are men and women. They are all clean. These are our professional teachers. They just have more personality. In summer, they wear shorts and a pair of punk Martin boots, which may be felt by ordinary people.

This should be the so-called cultural differences, haha, in fact, these are nothing. It's just that everyone looks at things from different angles, so we can't generalize, that is, artists are sloppy, which has a lot to do with personal living habits and has nothing to do with whether they engage in art or not. In people's eyes, artists should be those who are divorced from reality and go to an isolated cabin to create, or those who just wander in the mountains to take a good photo. No, art is just a part of life. While appreciating beauty, we should also respect the efforts behind art. Art is not sloppy, it is noble and needs to be appreciated with another eye.