Why do you say that photography is poor for three generations, and SLR destroys your life?

This sentence is a mockery, reflecting the relatively high cost of photography.

You can afford a SLR with an annual salary of100000.

The initial idea of playing photography was simple, and I wanted to buy a good camera. But when I came into contact with the basic concepts such as aperture, shutter and ISO, I began to visit photography forums or read equipment reviews, and was firmly instilled with the view that the camera is not important, but the lens is the key to image quality.

Lens is an expensive field in photography. Every kind of lens, such as "big ternary", "small ternary", "small white", "little black" and "small steel gun", costs a lot of money.

At the same time, some people will take collecting photographic equipment as a hobby, and the collection is actually bottomless. At this time, the names of major manufacturers began to appear in front of them. A, E, F, EF, FE and M bayonets have many choices, and the cost here is even greater.

Extended data

The love of SLR holders makes them pursue the high quality of SLR cameras and the integrity of its related accessories, including supports, lenses and other consumables. But at the same time, the high price of lens, fuselage and other spare parts of SLR cameras is a big problem that SLR enthusiasts have to face.

The simple explanation of "poor three generations of SLR" is that people who play SLR have spent three generations of money for SLR, which reflects from the side that SLR holders love it very much, even the "poor three generations" are willing to pay for it.

There is another sentence: once you enter Canon, you can't stop. As soon as I entered Nikon, I suffered internal injuries. As soon as I got into Leica, I only had underwear.

References:

Baidu encyclopedia-poor SLR three generations