Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Camera novice, which one should I choose between Fuji X-T20 and Olympus E-M5 Mark II?

Camera novice, which one should I choose between Fuji X-T20 and Olympus E-M5 Mark II?

According to the original poster’s shooting needs, I would also recommend the Fujifilm XT20.

1. Digital imaging, outsole is king. In other words, the larger the sensor area, the better. When the current sensor A/D technology (analog-to-digital conversion technology) is at the same technical level, SNR technology (signal-to-noise ratio) is the most important core that affects imaging. (The basis of the signal-to-noise ratio is the ratio between the total number of pixels and the sensor area. (The ratio of effective signal to invalid noise caused by the difference in pixel density). The Fuji XT20 (hereinafter referred to as Fuji) is equipped with a half-frame 24-megapixel X-Trans CMOS III sensor (area 3.73 square centimeters), and the Olympus E-M5 Mark II (hereinafter referred to as Olympus) is equipped with a 4/3-frame 16-megapixel sensor. Live MOS sensor (area 2.25 square centimeters), therefore, Fuji's pixel density is lower, the photosensitivity of a single pixel is better, and the imaging quality is higher, and Fuji has better signal-to-noise ratio indicators while also having Higher pixels allow for larger output (enlarged photos). At the same time, Fuji has a sensor with a larger area (larger image plane), and its blurring ability is stronger when using the same aperture lens;

2. Lens. The lens is the most important core that affects image quality. The image quality percentage is 45% for the sensor, 50% for the lens, and 5% for the processor. Since mirrorless cameras (mirror-less cameras) have interchangeable lenses, Fujifilm and Four Thirds systems each have good lenses and bad lenses, so it is difficult to compare them one by one. Fujifilm’s good lenses are better, but they are more expensive. Auba’s lens group A little richer, with the extreme values ??removed at both ends, the 4/3 system lens is better overall. What kind of lens to use depends on your wallet. Generally speaking, the high-end lens Fuji is better, the low-end lens Auba is better, and the mid-range lens is about the same, but the portability of the lens is better;

3. Processor. Due to the power of post-production software, the processor mainly plays a greater role in synthesis speed and other aspects. The relationship between RAW imaging quality and the processor is very small. I will not go into details. As far as the poster needs to record his life, Fuji and The difference in Auba's processor speed is basically negligible, and the RAW image quality can also be corrected through post-processing software. But in terms of direct-to-video quality, Fuji is better than Auba. Fuji also has its own exclusive film mode, which is very beautiful, but Auba’s automatic white balance is never accurate and the picture will be red. If it is turned off in the camera Warm colors tend to appear whitish. The only thing that Auba is proud of is the first-class blue in the industry, that is, "Oba Blue". But in terms of overall color, Fuji is better than Auba;

4. Control. Controls mainly include focus speed, accuracy, focus tracking ability, number of continuous shots, etc., related to shooting success rate. Fuji and Oba each have their own strengths. Among them, Fuji's highlight is the 325-point autofocus system, which focuses faster and wider, while Auba's 81-point autofocus system is quite different; Auba's highlight is its powerful five-axis anti-shake system and sensor shift technology (That is, 40-megapixel photos are obtained through sensor displacement shooting. This high-resolution mode can continuously shoot 8 16.1-megapixel images at a time. Each shot moves the sensor by 0.5 pixels and combines the data of the 8 images into one. A high-definition image, equivalent to shooting with a 40-megapixel image sensor). In terms of overall control performance, Fujifilm focuses faster and is more suitable for snapshots. Auba’s five-axis anti-shake is powerful and less likely to blur ( Sensor displacement is of little significance in recording life), each has its own merits.

5. In terms of overall image quality and control, Fuji is better, so I recommend Fuji XT20. As for the lenses, since Fuji lenses are relatively expensive, the author did not mention the budget, so I will give you a rough outline. If you have one camera and one lens, I recommend the Fuji XF16-55 for high-end configurations, the Fuji XF18-55 for low-end configurations, and the Fuji XC16-50 is not recommended. If you have one camera and two lenses, I recommend the XF18-55+XF56F1.2R (high-end configuration), or the XF18-55 +XF23F1.4R (middle configuration), or XF18-55+XF35F1.4R (middle and lower configuration). Other subjects, such as XF10-24F4R for landscape photography, XF100-400 for telephoto shooting, etc., will be added later depending on the situation;

6. As for appearance, everyone has his own preference, and there is no standard. But in terms of portability (body + lens), Auba is better than Fuji.