I am a girl and want to buy a micro-order from Olympus. The main purpose is to travel and take photos. Which is better, Olympus E-P3, E-PL3 or E-PL5?

1, strong sense of low position. The EPL5 uses Sony's CMOS, which was once used on the EM5 fuselage and received rave reviews. The color depth and tolerance are not a little better than EPL3.

2. high definition. Rumor has it that EPL5 picked a low pass, but it was not verified. From the practical use, the resolution of EPL5 is very high. Under the same conditions, the low-sensitivity image quality of EPL5 is by no means worse than that of bigger milkshake 5R and Canon EOSM, but it is not as good as Fuji XE 1. EPL5 is Oba's painstaking work, which contains many of Oba's latest technologies. The film foreground and close-up of small and medium aperture are sharp, with rich details, and the blur color of large aperture is natural.

3. Accurate white balance. After turning off warm color mode and white balance A-2 setting, automatic white balance is very accurate.

4, the focus is extremely fast. I pointed to the place where I hit the same head and hardly felt the shutter lag. I basically twitched once with the 20 cakes that were criticized for focusing. The touch focus of the LCD screen is also very fast, and the capture rate is above 90%.

5, strong anti-shake. Although it is not as good as the five-axis anti-shake EM5, the No.30 shutter does not paste in low light, and it has also achieved excellent results in micro-single. 6. High sense of promotion. O 1600 is not only available, but also can be well described, and the picture is clean and bright.

6, relatively portable. As everyone knows, I won't go into details.