Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Are there any horror films that are more horrible than Japanese curses, resentments and curses?
Are there any horror films that are more horrible than Japanese curses, resentments and curses?
There are many unnatural changes in the lens, and the change is too fast. Not only that, but sometimes it is deliberate. Obviously, the emotional three people are still filming, and many details can actually be deleted. However, considering that the film is still commercial, if most people want to understand it (everyone has different cultural literacy), it is better to be direct and understand the director's approach.
Finally, I want to point out that this film is based on a real person, and all the scenes in the play are not shot according to the DV of the real story, but only imitated and added. The version of the true story is the legend of three college students who went to the forest to explore witches, but they disappeared. Three days later, the police launched a big search and searched by satellite, but they could not be found. It wasn't until N years later that another group of college students dug up the backpack and DV of one of the missing persons, and there was no other news, but the police didn't think there was anything wrong with the DV content after reading it. But it inspired the director. That's why this movie, Blair Witch.
I think there is a lot of water about the authenticity of horror movies. It may come from a legend or short story invented by someone on a whim. But if you watch it on the premise of believing, you can actually go deeper into the essence of the film than watching it casually. Entering the play is not blindly believing, but can take you to analyze the content of the whole play. In fact, it is easier to find shortcomings. When you devote yourself to the play, what happens around the protagonist, and does the protagonist's behavior conform to the normal situation? As a half-horror movie lover, I just simply express my views. In this way, I respect the director's artistic works, but my personal preferences are different.
First, the filming of this film can be described as unique, which can even make those old-fashioned thrillers fall behind;
Secondly, I personally think that the success of this film mainly uses the following unique points that can make the audience fall into the trap:
1. First, it intervened in the form of a documentary, which laid a sense of reality in the hearts of the audience;
2. From the documentary stage of "interview" to the plot of "live shooting", the photographer's third-party role quietly changed into "starring". Haha, this clever move can really capture the hearts of the audience!
(Insert a digression. When I saw the protagonists patting the piles of "premeditated" stones after entering the forest, I couldn't help laughing and talking to myself on the screen: "Haha, people are your land, witches are your land!" I think this should be a turning point in documentary and acting.
3. The important effect of shooting with "civil DV" equipment is that the picture is not clear but more real, which dilutes the audience's view of "acting and filming" and makes it easier for people to "get into the play".
4. Brilliance that can't be ignored: quarrels, curses, natural gasps and sobs of fear run through the whole process, except for the word "true".
The so-called protagonist, the witch, never appeared from beginning to end, but only created her existence and "casting spells" from the side. More fear and mystery!
6. Finally, the close-up of the lens was deliberately emphasized, and the photographer really encountered this experience.
.
.
In short-it's true!
Third, but then again, this film is unique, but when it comes to the degree of "terror and terror", different people have different views. I think it is really possible for those who are easy to "get into the play" to break through their own fear limits through that mysterious crying, that crying that shocked their hearts, and that mysterious night scene in the forest. But for people like me who are rational enough to watch and analyze in Mu Na, the intimidation effect is not great, and of course the duration is impossible to talk about-although I admit that I have been caught by well-designed wonderful clips many times, haha!
In fact, there are still some loopholes in the details of the film. For example, in a dilapidated house, if the audience is careful, they can find that the camera switches smoothly between Michael and the heroine, making people think that the photographer is someone else, which seems a bit self-deprecating, hehe.
- Previous article:How to shoot mobile phone time-lapse photography?
- Next article:On the Patterns and Characteristics of Hollywood Movies from Roman Holiday
- Related articles
- Where is Zhejiang Bayi School in Ningbo?
- What do you need to prepare for a self-driving tour in Western Sichuan?
- How to choose clothes for a family photo How many sets of clothes do you usually need for a family photo?
- The 20th season of America's next top model contest.
- "Two-day Tour of Chishui Danxia" in go on road trip suburb of Beijing-go on road trip suburb.
- Zhao Guantao Martyr Photo
- What disease is vitiligo?
- Is there a 250% discount printed matter for issue 258 of 3d2022?
- Photographs of master photographer's graduation ceremony
- Why is there a yellow spot in my iqoo pro 5g photo?