My view on photography

Photography originated in the late 1930s. Daguerre was an artist when he was young. At about the age of thirty-five, he designed a Western-style mirror to show a panoramic picture with special lighting effects. While doing this work, he became interested in a landscape device that can automatically reproduce the world without brushes and pigments-in other words, a camera. That is to say, photography appeared with the development of science and technology to a certain extent, but nearly 100 years later, photography has not replaced painting, which fully shows that painting is a world that cannot be replaced by any form. Painting can reflect and express a person's heart, while photography is limited by many conditions and cannot better express an artist's attitude towards the world, but photography is loved by more people because of its simple operation. With the development of science and technology, cameras have developed rapidly from CCD-M8 to CCD-TR55, CCD-V30, CCD-V90, CCD-F300, CCD-TR555, DCP-PC3, and now to HDV 1080I and HDR-FX1E. Nowadays, digital cameras. ...

But photography is photography. He has made great progress on the road of art from heavy to light, from large particles to digital, but he still can't make up for the limitation of relying on reality and can't be as unconstrained as painting. Therefore, I personally think that photography has its own unique artistic space, but it can only satisfy most people who are not obsessed with art, but for those who prefer painting, it is just a tool for quickly obtaining materials.