Which is better, a camera or a camera? Why?

If you shoot videos professionally, of course, it's good to use a camera. Its biggest advantage is that it can stabilize the focus and eliminate some hand shake.

I often record short videos with a digital camera. I dare not push or pull the lens when recording. Once the lens is pushed and pulled, it will squeak and destroy the sound effect of the picture.

Another problem is focusing. The follow-up focusing of digital camera is not good. If fixed focus is used, virtual focus is easy to appear.

But the digital camera also has its advantages, especially its portability. Plus a small camera stabilizer, it is also easy to carry. I feel very tired when the camera is shooting the wedding. After a game, my back aches and my legs ache.

My suggestion is: as long as you don't record large-scale activities, you don't have to buy a camera.

Digital cameras can be said to be more than enough for shooting short videos and micro-movies.

As ordinary users, they generally don't consider the professional color correction and processing in the later stage of video, so they simply answer this question from the perspective of mass use without considering the video code rate, format and other indicators. .

If it is from the media or at home, or even some small live broadcasts, it is recommended to buy a SLR camera directly.

The current equipment tends to be simplified in operation, and simplification does not mean that the quality of video shooting will be poor. It used to be said that camera stability is better than SLR. After all, the camera is shoulder-shouldered, the SLR is hand-held, and the stability is still different.

These problems have been solved by the existing stabilizer of SLR, which can bring more effects than camera changes. So there is not much difference from the point of view of stability.

In addition, one of the advantages of camera shooting in the past is that there are many camera interfaces and strong compatibility. In the past, in the process of analog-to-digital conversion, analog interfaces, digital interfaces and so on were very complicated and prone to problems. At present, SLR is a unified interface of hdmi audio and video, which largely solves the problem of incompatibility.

One of the great advantages of SLR shooting is that the lens can be changed according to the shooting needs, so there are more means to express the tension of the picture. Telephoto shooting, wide-angle shooting scenery, zoom shooting activities. There are also some auxiliary zoom motors to make the picture feel richer. The focusing function is also automatic now, so it is very convenient in many cases.

In addition, storage devices are becoming more and more convenient and cheaper. The video itself is also more popular, and professional things are becoming more and more popular. On the contrary, the video content itself has become the essence of deciding whether it is good or bad.

As a video worker, to sum up:

SLR micro-single: micro-movies, life vlog, weddings, commercials, portable, cheap, and the picture quality is enough.

Camera: large-scale activities, high quality and high frame rate, slow motion, better details, and more space for color matching in the later stage.

Which is better, the camera or the camera? First of all, you should be clear about your usage scenarios. Both cameras are very professional shooting equipment. To choose the equipment that suits you, you must first understand the advantages and disadvantages of cameras and camcorders.

The camera mainly takes a single photo and pursues the quality of a single photo. The shooting speed is several to ten shots per second. You can express your ideas through photos, mainly static, or you can shoot videos, but the time for shooting videos is limited. I can't shoot it for a long time. Compared with the camera, the weight is much lighter. In terms of price, cameras are much cheaper than video cameras.

The camera mainly records video, as well as sound and images. There is no requirement for shooting time. As long as there is electricity and enough storage space, you can keep shooting. In addition, the anti-shake camera is designed for shooting video, which is much better than the camera in anti-shake, and the performance of video focusing and autofocus is also very good.

Therefore, if you just shoot short films, promote short videos or record your life, you can choose a camera, because the camera is relatively cheap, and you can also take pictures at the same time, killing two birds with one stone. If you shoot TV, movies, news, large scenes, etc. , you can choose a camera. If the video quality is not high, it takes a long time to shoot, so it is light and convenient to buy a digital video camera. The specific purchase depends on your usage scenario and budget.

To shoot video, for amateurs, Sony's micro-single A7M3 is recommended, which has high resolution, rich color details, large adjustable space for later P-pictures, and more importantly, autofocus.

Whether for amateurs or professionals, it is a high-quality choice.

The camera is a product of the old TV era. It is big and heavy. Of course, if you want to take some retro pictures, you can consider it.

First of all, it depends on what kind of video you are shooting, whether it is a large-scale performance, get-together, wedding, micro-movie, or a short video from the media. If it is a long performance and get-together, you choose a camera, if it is other, you can choose a camera.

Originally, the camera was used to take pictures, and the camera was used to shoot videos, which was clearly divided. Later, with the progress of science and technology, in order to seize the market, cameras and video cameras have a tendency to "infiltrate" each other. The camera has added the function of shooting video, which is more and more powerful and convenient. In order to improve the image quality, the camera also absorbed the advantages of the camera, changed the lens bayonet design, and let many camera lenses be directly mounted on the camera.

At present, with the increasingly powerful camera and shooting function of mobile phones, it is easy to shoot videos. For non-professionals, people have solved the problem of taking photos and videos on mobile phones. For professionals and professional organizations, more and more people choose to shoot videos with cameras.

In the case of almost the same price, shooting video with a camera shows many advantages that cameras can't match. First, the background blur effect is more, the film feeling is stronger, and the picture is taller. Second, the sensitivity is high, and high-quality images can still be taken in dark light. Third, the fuselage is small and easy to carry.

Nevertheless, at present, the camera can't take the place of the video camera, because the camera itself is born for shooting video. When shooting video, the camera will show its advantages in terms of its body and accessories, especially when shooting active scenes.

Which is better, a camera or a camera? Why?

Cameras and camcorders depend on your choice. If you choose a good camera, such as AX700E or AX 100E, the photo effect is ok, the focusing speed is fast and the frame rate is high. If it is a small camera at home, the effect is not good. It is recommended to buy a micro-camera, which has fast follow-up focusing, large photosensitive element size, good imaging effect and smooth picture.