Bicycle photography

Whether it is Canon, Nikon or Sony, there must be a reason to be called Big Three Yuan. There are so many shots in all. Why are these shots called Big Three Yuan? Canon Sony 16-35f2.8 24-70 70-200 Nikon 14-24 70-200 24-70.

First of all, 16-35 and 14-24 are very good wide-angle lenses. f2.8 has a constant aperture, which is an indispensable lens for shooting wide-angle, and it is not awkward at all. The picture quality and effect are very good. 24-70 As a process to meet the requirements of the medium focus section, take a group photo. The wedding process and activities are good shots, which can basically be seen at the end. Very convenient. As a medium-long zoom portrait lens, 70-200 has good depth of field and blur. Take close-ups. It's not chicken ribs at all

All three lenses are f2.8 constant zoom lenses. The focal lengths are not in conflict. Cooperate with each other to meet most of the coke plates. So I don't think it's chicken ribs. All this is easy to use. Wide angle close-up, process. I think they are all very suitable shots.

If you have to choose one. I think. 24-70 can be exchanged, but I don't think it's chicken ribs. I don't think it's chicken ribs. It is the best shot for this focal part.

All the big ternary lenses are similar, that is, three zoom lenses with different focal lengths:

These three lenses are constantly updated by various manufacturers, covering the focal segments commonly used from ultra wide angle to medium telephoto (except ultra telephoto).

Scenery shooting, 16-35 and 70-200 have their own characteristics, the former has impact and the latter has a sense of space compression;

Portrait shooting, 24-70 and 70-200 are used frequently (24-70 is used more when shooting in the shed).

There is no such thing as chicken ribs in these shots, just look at your budget and shooting type.

The budget is low, with a small ternary with a similar focal length, but the aperture is smaller;

It's not convenient. You can choose a fixed focus lens.

Basically, photographers who work have three yuan, or at least one or two, and the worst one has three yuan to hang up. Don't take a special case as an example. This is the actual situation.

Yes, basically every photographer will say that the big ternary lens is good, and few people don't like it. After all, it is the main force of portrait lens, representing the highest quality of lens!

Which big ternary lens is the chicken? So let's first look at which three shots can be called big three yuan. Canon Dayuan 16-35mmF2.8, 24-70mmF2.8, 70-200mmF2.8, Nikon 14-24mmF2.8, 24-70mmF2.8, 70-200mmF2.8, just these three lenses. Do you have chicken ribs? Don't!

Wide angle 16-35mm or 14-24mm chicken ribs? Impossible, this is the main shot of the landscape portrait, and many landscape lovers can't do without this focal length (the aperture doesn't have to be F2.8). Ultra-wide lenses are essential for scenery, and pounds of momentum photos can only be taken with these lenses! Impossible, chicken ribs!

24-70mm chicken ribs? Similarly, indoor shooting is not as convenient as 24-70, it can be long or short, and the aperture is not small. Indoor portrait is the main lens, unless you use fixed focus, the quality of this lens is still ok, mainly for convenience. When I was shooting indoors, including the wedding ceremony, this lens played a great advantage!

70-200mm chicken ribs? If the first two pieces are not chicken ribs, and the last piece is 70-200, it is estimated that it will be dead. This is the best zoom for outdoor portraits and even landscape shooting, which shows that this lens has a wide range of uses. Obviously, these three shots are not chicken ribs. If someone really thinks chicken ribs, then there is only one possibility, for example, I don't like the scenery. Then, I think shots like 16-35 are chicken ribs and I don't like portraits. I think 24-70mm chicken ribs or something!

No chicken ribs.

Each of these three lenses has excellent performance, and each lens has distinct characteristics.

The so-called chicken ribs are that photographers blindly choose to buy lenses that don't match their own photography style or theme, and as a result, they can't give full play to their own lens characteristics and achieve the desired results.

When choosing a lens, think more about whether you need to use this lens to create, whether it is suitable for your own photography habits and photography themes; For example, for a 24-70 lens, the wide-angle end is not wide enough, and the 70 end is slightly shorter; However, it covers 35, 50 and two most commonly used focal sections, and the scenery and portraits are quite satisfactory; 16-35 this lens uses its wide-angle end at most, and 24 is also quite satisfactory; Not to mention 70-200, it is the existence of every Canon user's god.

I made a greedy mistake the first time I played digital SLR. I used to buy three yuan in my pocket. After a while, I felt that 16-35 and 24-70 could not meet my requirements, and 70-200 was also dropped after the second generation. The reason for the loss is not the poor quality of ternary, but that there are higher-order lenses to choose from, so we start with 14L, 35L, 50L, 85L, 200L. It should be said that it is very good, but after playing for several years, I found that 24-70 (the second generation) is too practical in landscape photography, so I bought this zoom lens; Then 14L and 35L came out one after another, because they were not used as often as before, but left idle for too long, and their favorite photography subjects changed. ...

I wrote so much, mainly to explain that with the change of my favorite theme and the improvement of lens quality requirements, the lens in my hand will also change with my preferences; Moreover, the lens is not as complete as possible, which will only lead to waste. However, when you think that a lens can help you shoot your favorite theme and meet your imaging requirements, you should consider whether to buy it, so that it will be handy to play, and there will be no phenomenon that a lens in your hand is idle in the drying oven, which is a chicken rib.

I hope I can help you.

The choice of lens is always based on the theme. Some masters use one or two lenses all their lives, depending on what you want to shoot. Big ternary is called big ternary, on the one hand, it is the coverage of golden focal length, on the other hand, it is the imaging effect, and the aperture is fixed. Although the effect is not as good as focusing, it is not as good as theory. Equipment is always just equipment. If you want to shoot well, your head is more important. The threshold of photography is low, but it is difficult to play well. It needs accumulation, practice, creativity and courage. In addition, you need some social experience and communication skills. Photography can never be taken casually.

In 2000, I published an essay "Don't go to the middle" in Friends of Photography, telling the idea of choosing Da Sanyuan as a photographer at that time. At that time, I was more in pursuit of so-called artistic photography. I really felt that the lens angle with medium focal length was too mediocre, so I "set an example" and lost my 24-70 lens for a 50mm large aperture lens. ...

But now, I am much more rational, and maybe I will pay more attention to the humanities. I think this middle paragraph is also indispensable. I even went into two "middle sections" of 24- 120, and once hit myself in the face. ...

If you want me to give you a suggestion, I suggest you decide according to the subjects you often shoot. If you often shoot indoors, I suggest not to shoot telephoto. If you like shooting outdoor beauty, I suggest not shooting wide-angle photos. If you like the scenery, you can give up the middle one. If you refuse to give up all the subjects, you can still take them all away, because it won't cost much money and take up too much space. ...

Talk about their characteristics and shooting purpose.

16-35, his design concept is to shoot scenery+humanity. The super wide angle with super aperture is definitely the favorite of landscape photographers. In addition, 35 can be used to make up for the wide angle slightly, which is very useful for some nearby scenery. In addition, 35 can also play a great role in humanities. If you use him to take portraits, you will be a little reluctant.

24-70, his design concept is mainly aimed at the universal portrait wedding photo studio. Using this lens in these occasions will give full play to its value, convenience and flexibility, and excellent image quality. If he used it to shoot Scenery 24, it would be a little reluctant.

70-200, his design concept is mainly portrait+landscape. For outdoor portrait shooting, this lens can give full play to its telephoto advantage and bring a very strong sense of compression. When used for landscape photography, you can shoot distant and close shots.

Which lens is the worst in the third dimension? This is a false proposition in itself.

First of all, each shot has its photographic purpose and the pertinence of the object. This correspondence is irreplaceable to some extent, which determines the unique application value of each lens.

Secondly, it is the different professional fields, preferences and skills of photographers, which also determines the different use frequency and performance requirements of different lenses.

In this sense, no lens is chicken ribs. It depends on how far you can bring its performance into play.

24-70 whoever buys it is stupid, because after buying it, it is idle to prepare, and it is completely useless in the big three yuan! You think, the progress of technology cannot be solidified, and the big ternary will be completely replaced by the big binary 14-50f2.8; 50-200f2.8, I hope that the majority of photographers will push the concept of big binary.

There's nothing wrong with it. Look at your own theme preference. For myself, 70-200 is chicken ribs, but others may be inseparable.