Is it infringement to use a painter to do animation?

The use of cartoon pictures by photography companies violates these rights. However, if the photography company obtains the permission of the animator and pays the corresponding remuneration, it does not constitute infringement. According to relevant laws and regulations, users who use their works without the permission of the copyright owner and fail to pay remuneration constitute infringement and should bear corresponding legal responsibilities.

legal ground

/kloc-Article 52 of the Copyright Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), which came into effect on June 0.

Anyone who commits one of the following acts of infringement shall, according to the circumstances, bear civil liabilities such as stopping the infringement, eliminating the influence, apologizing and compensating for the losses:

(4) distorting or tampering with other people's works;

(5) Plagiarizing other people's works;

(6) Using a work by means of exhibition, filming of audio-visual products, etc., or using a work by means of adaptation, translation, annotation, etc. without the permission of the copyright owner, except as otherwise provided by this Law;

(seven) the use of another person's work, which should be paid but not paid;

(9) Using the layout design of books and periodicals published by publishers without their permission;

(10) Live broadcast or public dissemination of a live performance or recording of a performance without the permission of the performer;

(eleven) other acts of infringement of copyright and copyright-related rights.