Is it necessary to enter 50 1.4 for Canon 24-70F2.8?

Is it necessary to enter 50 1.4 for Canon 24-70F2.8?

24-70 and 50, except for 50mm focal length overlap, the others are not wasted at all. That is to say, even if it is 24-70 f 2.8, it is extremely necessary to start with a lens of 50 f 1.4 or 50 f 1.8 or even 50 f 1.2.

Let's not discuss the quality gap between zoom lens and fixed-focus lens for the time being, but recall the old saying that "cows become worse than dogs" Now 50 f 1.4 and 24-70 f 2.8 are the contrast between cattle and cattle, and the quality contrast between those two lenses is obvious.

The contrast of aperture between f 1.4 and f 2.8, and the contrast of fixed focus and zoom lens will make you prefer each lens with 50 settings.

The lens of 24-70mm f 2.8 is almost perfect in focal length coverage, and the scenery, humanities, documentary, figures and portraits can be well controlled. If you say you are an ordinary photographer, this lens is enough.

At this time, adding a 50 f 1.4 is the icing on the cake. This lens is not as expensive as 50 f 1.2. Moreover, this lens is small and convenient, with standard focal length and large aperture, which is especially suitable for photography and practice.

The feature of 50mm fixed focus is that it can advance and retreat, which is inconvenient compared with zoom head. But in fact, it greatly exercises and improves the writing level of users. How much I enter and how much I retreat can make my framing picture and composition perfect, which requires photographers to think more about framing and composition.

Therefore, even if you already have a 24-70mm f 2.8 lens, I strongly recommend that you start with 50 fixed lenses, especially photography. This lens will give you more value than the lens itself.

It's not necessary. Not that your 2470 contains anything, but 50- 1.4 is terrible. After all, it is a cheap lens. What is better to eat for one or two thousand yuan? Its shooting is often out of focus. I can't bear to take big pictures. Take a full-body photo. Not only is the picture quality poor, but it is also burnt. I suggest you don't get into 50 foolishly. If you really like taking portraits and need a fixed-focus lens, I suggest you enter 85- 1.4, which is better than 50- 1.4 100%.

For ordinary daily shooting, according to my personal shooting experience, the "double standard" combination of standard zoom and standard focal length (50mm) has always been my most recommended lens combination.

Many people think that F2.8 of 24-70mm also contains 50mm, so the aperture of 50mm F 1.4 is larger. But it is by enlarging the aperture of these two gears that 50mm F 1.4 has more possibilities when shooting.

50mm F 1.4 is two steps larger than the 50 end of 24-70 mm F2.8, and it is the difference between these two steps that makes 50mm F 1.4 have great advantages in both blur and weak light.

The reason why I always recommend the "double standard" combination of standard zoom and standard focal length (50mm) is because the focal length covered by standard zoom is basically the most commonly used focal length in daily shooting, while 50mm is used when stronger blur or relatively extreme weak light is needed.

So in my opinion, the two lenses of 24-70mm F2.8 and 50mm F 1.4 are more complementary to each other, rather than "24-70mm also includes 50mm focal length" as many people think. Therefore, personally, it is necessary to purchase an extra 50mm F 1.4 for daily shooting under the premise of 24-70 mm F2.8.

Simple, rude, quick and direct, no nonsense, no waste of traffic, photos that have nothing to do with you, 1 minute to figure it out, take the phone and leave!

Look at the demand. If you are a professional photographer specializing in portrait photography, you must buy F 1.4 lens, but not necessarily 50 focal length, because the large aperture has this absolute position and sense of detachment in portrait photography, which is irreplaceable by 24-70. Although the other 50 focal lengths belong to the portrait lens, this focal length requires the photographer to walk back and forth a few steps when shooting, because 50 focal lengths are like our human monocular perspective. 35 is not easy to use, 35 is our human binocular perspective. If I have to choose a lens with 24-70, I personally recommend 35F 1.4, and it is up to him to shoot people and scenery.

Well, I hope my answer can help you. If I am wrong, please give me some advice. Remember to like my answers and comments. Thank you-

Is it necessary to enter 50 1.4 for Canon 24-70F2.8?

These two shots are good shots, but they don't conflict at all. If you have 24-70, you can start with 50 fixed-focus lenses.

Canon 50/ 1.4 fixed-focus lens, in fact, this lens is a lens for human portraits. Because it is a fixed-focus lens, its imaging is reliable, with excellent imaging quality, fine image quality and high definition. In addition, because it has a relatively large aperture, it is also very attractive in Jiao Wai's blur. This lens is a good choice for shooting human folk customs and portraits. Of course, this lens is also used to shoot flowers.

In short, although 24-70 contains 50, if you like taking portraits, this shot is still worth starting with. If you are just an ordinary fan, you can buy it or not, just have fun.

I'm glad to answer this question. Let's not talk about what kind of lens to use. It's just convenient to use more lenses like zoom. Although it is 24-70mm f2.8, the most "talented" camera lens is fixed focus!

Specialize in art

Fixed focus, there are special lenses, wide-angle fixed focus, portrait fixed focus, medium focus and telephoto fixed focus. It can be seen that any subject has fixed focus, and the role of fixed focus cannot be underestimated! And if you don't worry too much about the aperture, it is a more affordable choice to buy a variety of fixed focus of 1.8 series! The fixed focus structure is simple, the aperture is much larger than zoom, and the picture quality is surprisingly transparent. The photos taken are not as good as zoom!

Shooting type

Although 24-70mm contains a focal length of 50mm, it is still far from the fixed focal length of 50mm, not to mention the 50mm of F 1.4. Not only is the picture quality good, but the price is much cheaper than 24-70 mm If the subject has a dream, buy a fixed focus and try it and feel the fun of photography!

For more exciting information, you can pay attention to Aperture and Shutter!

I have both shots, the first shot is 50 1.4, and the second shot is 24-70. After 24-70, 1.4 is basically not used. There are three reasons: first, the focal length of 24-70 can completely cover the focal length of 50. Second, 50 1.4 is out of focus, and photos are often out of focus. I basically have no out-of-focus problems with other lenses. Third, when the aperture is large, the purple edge phenomenon is serious.

If it is 24-70, it is not recommended to enter 50 1.4.

The focal lengths of these two lenses are a bit repetitive, but if you really want to take a portrait of sugar water, you might as well take one first. For 50/ 1.4, you may wish to consider that the price of Sigma ART 50/ 1.44000 is more than half cheaper than that of Canon, and it is very cost-effective. There are comments on these two shots online, so you may wish to have a look. Many indicators are basically consistent with Canon 50/65438+. However, it should be noted that the focal length of 50/ 1.4 is slightly shorter, which is more suitable for indoor portraits. It is best to choose 85/ 1.4 for outdoor portraits. Similarly, Sigma art85/ 1.4 is more cost-effective. The disadvantage of these two lenses is that they are heavy More than 800 grams is not a decimal. If you don't have enough arm strength, it will be very tiring to shoot for a day, girls.

It is necessary to enter! You will find the large aperture interesting. When the aperture is large, the shutter speed can be increased without flashing in the dark area. You can also take a lot of creative photography. The blur of the portrait is very beautiful, which is not what 24-70 can bring you. You deserve a big aperture!

I have a 24-70 Canon head. But then I hesitated and added 50 1.4. However, in actual shooting, the advantage of 50 fixed-focus lens is not obvious, but it is awkward to use, so that my head has been buried in my camera bag since then. In view of my personal experience, I don't want you to buy it.