Hello. Excuse me, what are the differences, advantages and disadvantages of the three series of Sony Black Card RX 100, RX 1?

Ha, this is a big problem. I'll try to answer. The lines may not be too rigorous, but the conclusion will not be too outrageous.

1 Compared with three black cards, the bigger the bottom, the more expensive the lens, but with different uses.

Small black card (RX 100 series). At present, small black cards are divided into four generations. When the first generation was released, it shocked the world. It was the best quality card machine at that time, and none of them was rated as one of the top 50 inventions in the world in 20 12 by Time magazine. Time magazine lists the camera as the only major invention in the world today, and the black card is the only one. Judging from the current imaging level of the camera, 1 inch sensor is the boundary ridge with excellent image quality. The black card generation uses Sony's own 20.2 megapixel 1 inch sensor. At that time, it was unique in the world, equipped with a T* coated lens equivalent to 28- 100mm (Zeiss blue label certification, not Zeiss blue circle). First of all, it has achieved a small body and high image quality; In the second generation of black card, the direct sensor of the first generation was changed to the back-illuminated sensor (not to mention other added small functions, the same below), which slightly improved the high sense; On the basis of the second generation, the third generation has replaced the fake Zeiss T* lens with better quality, which is equivalent to 24-70mm, and the image quality has improved obviously; In the fourth generation, the 1 inch back-illuminated sensor was changed into a stacked sensor, and the photoelectric signal conversion speed was faster, mainly serving for 4K video. The first generation of black cards has the highest cost performance, the third generation of black cards has the best photos, and the fourth generation of black cards has the strongest video;

B big black card (RX 1 series). There are three generations of big black cards at present. The first generation used a 24-megapixel Quan Huafu sensor developed by Sony and a fake Zeiss 35mmF2T* fixed-focus lens, which was very expensive at that time. The landlord asked: Why is the camera with non-interchangeable lens still so expensive? Actually, it's not expensive to think about it. The most valuable cameras are sensors and lenses. The body of Quan Huafu sensor is not cheap, and a good lens is more expensive, especially a 35mm bull's head. The price of Canon 35 red circle and Nikon 35 gold circle is tens of thousands. Canon Nikon's full-body fuselage plus 35 fixed-focus bull's head is more than RX 1 The difference is that the control and expansibility of SLR are better, and the portability of big black card is better. Everyone needs what he wants; The second generation of big black card (RX 1R) cancels the low-pass filter, and the image quality is sharper (canceling the low-pass requires technical support, not just removing a piece of glass); The third generation (RX 1RM2) replaced the 40-megapixel sensor and focusing system, but the lens remained unchanged, and the image quality and control were improved, especially the focusing, which was greatly improved.

C. fat black card (RX 10 series). At present, there are three generations of fat black cards, and the use of sensors is synchronized with that of small black cards. The highlight of the first generation is the use of a fake Zeiss T* lens with a constant aperture of 24-200mm. Constant F2.8 lenses are mirrors of various families (including full-width and half-width constant F2.8 lenses), which are expensive and have excellent image quality. In addition, most other lenses with constant F2.8 are around 24-70, and only the fat black card can achieve a constant F2.8 of 24-200. 1 inch Canon G3X and Panasonic FZ 100 have longer focal lengths, but they are not constant F2.8 (the larger the aperture of the telephoto end of the zoom lens, the better. At present, the constant F2.8 is the technical standard, and only Sigma can achieve the constant 18-35. The second generation of Fat Black Card has improved 4K video, and the photo quality is the same as that of the first generation. The third generation of Fat Black Card has replaced the fake Zeiss T* lens with the lens equivalent to 24-600F2.4-4, basically realizing all the themes from macro to big bird. A good camera is the best in the world. Look at the proofs taken by professional evaluation institutions (DP laboratory in Germany, etc.). ), the picture quality is amazing. However, the picture quality of the fat black card will not surpass the three generations of the small black card anyway. The lens of the third generation of the little black card is the strongest in the all-in-one machine, much stronger than the Canon G7X of the same level.

D. The small black card is mainly portable and is a standard standby machine; The big black card is mainly based on image quality, focusing on portable computers; Fat black card is mainly tourism, and its positioning is very clear.

2. The advantages of black card are mainly two points: easy to use and easy to carry. For example, RX 1R can be put in a satchel at will, but the film is excellent. This portability is valued by many photographers on the premise of ensuring image quality; For example, the little black card is a pocket machine that can be put into jeans, and the picture quality is not much different from that of a dog's head. There is no publicity about carrying SLR cameras everywhere, so the market for black cards, large and small, is huge and the sales volume is excellent. Fat black cards are mainly convenient in focal length and not small in size. Consumer groups are mainly tourists and photographers who are tired of changing lenses, so the sales volume is not leading, but the future market should not be underestimated. At least I personally took a fancy to RX 10M3.

There is no doubt that the picture quality of A6000+E 16-70 is better than that of small black card and fat black card. On the one hand: digital imaging, outsole king, A6000 is a half-width sensor, and the small black card is a 1 inch sensor, which is an insurmountable physical gap under the current technology; On the other hand: 16-70 is a good start, the optical quality is good, but the price can be the same as that of a black card. The recognized image quality percentage in photography circle is that the sensor accounts for 45%, the lens accounts for 50%, the image processor accounts for 5% (it is also said that the sensor accounts for 50% and the lens accounts for 45%), and A6000+E 16-70 is better in any aspect, so the image quality is definitely better than the small black card.

4. I haven't discussed many issues in detail, such as the overall contrast between RX 100M3 lens and E 16-70 lens (imaging difference caused by resolution, luminous flux and material). The logic may be imprecise and the persuasiveness may be lacking, but the conclusion may not be wrong, otherwise the length will be too long.

Landlord reference.