Which is more important, photography or late PS?

This problem is dealt with according to the situation, and it cannot be generalized.

Excellent photographers, their works have not undergone complicated post-processing. They have strong control over equipment, lighting, composition and so on. More than a decade ago, many photographers were unwilling to accept digital cameras and stubbornly used film cameras. On the one hand, it can eliminate the dependence on digital post-processing.

At present, digitalization has penetrated into all levels of people's lives. It brings a very convenient post-processing process. Through image processing tools such as ps, incredible works can also be created.

As far as a picture is concerned, we can't simply comment on whether photography is important or late.

For example, in today's movies, action blockbusters rely heavily on late special effects, but people like to watch them and think they are awesome. This does not mean that those plays without special effects are not good movies.

However, if there must be an answer, I think it is 60% to 40%. More appropriate.