Is Pentax k50 better or ks 1 better?

Ks 1 is better. K50 is too old, the pixels are not as good as many mobile phones, and the color is just like that. At that time, the gimmicks relying on three defenses were praised as mid-range machines by many people, but they were actually entry-level products. Buying a camera is not for hitting people, nor can it really be used in extreme weather. Imaging quality is the most important reference.

Ks 1 Except for three defenses, almost all other parameters are better than k50. Although not many, the gap is not small. Small size, light weight, anti-shake, camera focusing are very practical, and the color pixels are not bad. Some people say that there is no flip screen, no wifi, and I can only laugh-flipping the screen is meaningless except for taking selfies. There is a kind of memory card called wifi card, which does not need the camera's own function. It seems that many people's knowledge needs to be updated. Ks 1 doesn't have many fancy functions, so there is no money to waste-except lanterns. The only reason for poor reputation is styling. In fact, physical objects are not ugly, but they are not photogenic.

At present, the prices of both are at the same level, so ks 1, which is obviously superior in imaging quality, is of course more cost-effective.

If the budget is enough, it will be better to go to KS2, and you can buy what you want at the same price.

Ks 1 has just passed the fresh period and the price is in a reasonable period, which is very suitable for beginners who have certain requirements on image quality and pursue simplicity and practicality. If it weren't for the photographic equipment party, it would basically be scrapped.