Are photographers and repair unions losing their jobs in the process of technological development?

First, define the concept of "teacher". Nowadays, anyone who takes a camera casually is called a photographer, and anyone who can drive a ps brush is called a retoucher. The threshold of this major is too low, which seems too low. Referring to medical care, law, finance, architecture, computer and other fields, professional practitioners may not all be called "teachers". Lawyers have to pass very difficult judicial examinations, architects have to take notes on construction, accountants have to take notes on exams quickly, doctors have to take photos, and senior computer engineers have many practicing certificates. These are real professional qualifications.

After all, photography does not involve the safety of life and property, and it seems that there is no need for strict professional qualification examination. But the industry will naturally screen talents. Therefore, I am afraid that those who can be called "photographers" and "retouchers" in the future are truly powerful professionals and enjoy lofty treatment. So in a short time, no, the photo processing company will release a new version regardless of improvement, but in the long run, when the automatic photo technology reaches a certain advanced level, it will disappear, but the visual inspection time will be longer, because the photo design is 1000 people 1000 Hamlets. Have you ever used a SLR? Or can I use a SLR? If you can't even set the parameters, RAW knows nothing. It is not surprising to say that mobile phone photography is comparable to SLR. I've been using SLR for a year and a half, and I'm just a passerby with no access, a pure amateur. But I clearly know that "mobile phone photography is comparable to SLR" is a false proposition. At certain moments, mobile phone photography can rival SLR, which does not mean that mobile phone photography can replace SLR. If everyone can do one thing, it is not a major. There is a market for professional things, and professional instruments and practitioners are naturally needed. At most, it is to improve the micro-single level. I am worried that many years later, human beings will not be satisfied with graphic creation and the industry will decline.