Canon 60D or Canon 1 100D, which is more cost-effective? thank you

The design is a typical Canon low-end SLR appearance. Although there is no gorgeous appearance, it is strong inside.

Manipulating various control keys is still relatively humanized. However, some functions are omitted or integrated because the positioning is lower than 3-digit models. For example, the familiar functions such as mirror pre-lifting and depth of field prediction are cancelled; The buttons behind the main dial wheel are also integrated buttons, which are flash pop-up buttons by default, but they can also be set as ISO setting buttons through the menu ... but these small inconveniences will not affect our shooting too much. After all, the main shooting functions and settings are still very convenient.

Imaging adopts APS-C CMOS with effective pixel of12.2 million as image acquisition unit, and ISO is 100-6400. I give the imaging of EOS 1 100D 5 points, mainly because its1220,000 pixel CMOS adopts microlens technology, which shortens the distance between pixels and makes the area of a single pixel larger. This directly leads to lower high-sensitivity noise of 1 100D, and the image quality is better than other entry models or even worse than some mid-range models. In the same dark environment, I took the same photos at the same time with 1 100D and 60D. When observing the dark noise, it is found that the noise of 1 100D is much less and the details are clearer. Moreover, the comparison of test results is obtained when standard noise reduction is turned on for 60 days and 1 100D is not turned on.

The feel can only be said to be very general. Because of the low positioning, even the handle is wrapped in plastic. The natural feel is also very general. However, the fuselage is very light, and girls with weaker strength can easily control it. ...

Although the color positioning is low, the processing chip has not shrunk like 1000D, and the Digic4 generation processing chip is also used. Therefore, its color reproduction ability is not inferior to any digital SLR camera of Canon.

The performance focusing system has not shrunk as much as 1000D, and it also adopts the 9-point focusing used by Canon's low-end digital SLR, and the center point is the cross-shaped focus point, so the focusing in dark light and backlight is not inferior to its higher-level models. But it cancels spot metering in metering, which should also be the requirement of low-end positioning, but its product evaluation metering matrix is a brand-new 63-zone metering matrix system. As for continuous shooting's speed, it's also quite satisfactory and ordinary. ...

Comprehensive evaluation I have been paying attention to it since I heard that Canon will launch 1 100D. Maybe too many high-end devices are just greedy, so this low-end and cost-effective product can stimulate my desire to buy more, and I care more about its cost-effectiveness. After my purchase and use, I think 1 100D is a qualified Canon digital SLR camera. Although the low-end is cheap, there is still a "Pentium" heart! (Haha, joking) In the process of using it, I also experienced many inconveniences caused by function reduction and integration, but they were all overcome by me one by one. EOS 1 100D is the most simplified Canon digital SLR camera, which cancels almost all redundant functions that can be cancelled and concentrates on providing the creators with the most essential Canon digital SLR technology. Although it is cheap, it can take photos that are not inferior to high-end SLR cameras.