Is the video clip of today's headlines infringing? Is it infringement to send pictures and texts?

Whether it is sending pictures or editing videos, it is infringement without the consent of the right holder! Infringe on the copyright of the copyright owner, and may also infringe on the portrait right of the portrait owner.

At the moment when short video is becoming a trend, many UP owners mix and cut classic film and television works in a very creative way in order to get traffic and income. The classic example is The Journey to the West's editing and re-creation. Some UP owners are even more heartless, directly intercepting the climax of film and television works and posting them online to earn income.

According to the provisions of China's Copyright Law, the above acts are all infringements in the legal sense, infringing on the property rights of film and television works, including: the right to use, the right to spread information on the Internet, the right to adapt, the right to assemble, the right to license and the right to receive remuneration. The right holder of a film and television work has the right to claim compensation from the infringer. According to the provisions of the copyright law, if the loss is difficult to determine, compensation can be made according to the illegal income of the infringer, including the reasonable expenses paid by the right holder for safeguarding rights.

For the infringement of online pictures, in addition to the above rights, if there is a portrait right in the picture, it may also infringe on the portrait right. Portrait right is a part of personality right in civil code. The infringed has the right to request the infringer to stop the infringement, publicly apologize and compensate for the losses according to the provisions of the Civil Code. The loss will be judged according to the social popularity and the degree of infringement of the portrait holder. The most classic example is the "Ge Youlie" rights protection incident in recent years.