What is the difference between marrying a man with a mortgage as a civil servant and marrying a man without a mortgage company?

How big is the difference between the two? First of all, for civil servants with mortgages, mortgages are nothing to him at all, because people like civil servants and institutions have five insurances and one gold, or even five insurances and two gold. Therefore, their housing provident fund can basically solve the remaining mortgage problems. They only need to pay the down payment to buy a house, and the rest of the mortgage, their monthly housing provident fund is enough to deduct. So, if you marry a civil servant, even if he has a mortgage, you have nothing to worry about for the rest of your life. In the eyes of most people, civil servants are regarded as iron rice bowls. Living with such people, you will have no worries about food and clothing all your life. Of course, if you want to get rich, live a high-class life, and choose such a person to get married, you can't be second. For men who don't have a mortgage to work in the company, it's actually quite good, but compared with the work of civil servants, their work is not as stable as that of civil servants, and their wages fluctuate. Moreover, in society, the status of these two people is different. After all, the work of civil servants is still relatively glorious on the surface.

So I suggest that the best choice between these two men is to have a mortgage and be a public servant. This man, after all, has a stable job and is gorgeous. Even if he takes it out, you have a lot of face. Their time is relatively free and they enjoy various official holidays.