What should I do if the portrait right of WeChat official account is violated?

What should I do if the portrait right of WeChat official account is violated? In judicial practice, using other people's portraits for non-profit purposes without my consent may also constitute an infringement of other people's portrait rights. The General Principles of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Article 100 of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulate that citizens have the right to portrait and may not use their portraits for profit without their consent. Article 120 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that if a citizen's right to name, portrait, reputation and honor is infringed, he has the right to demand that the infringement be stopped, his reputation be restored, the influence be eliminated, an apology be made, and compensation be paid. Strictly speaking, in photography activities, as long as there is one of the following circumstances, it can be considered as infringement of the portrait rights of others. 1. The act of using the portrait right without the consent of the portrait right holder and without hindrance. The act of using a portrait without the consent of the portrait owner is also called "improper use of another person's portrait". The legal provisions on the right of portrait in China's civil law are basically aimed at "improper use" of the right of portrait. This improper use can be divided into "for profit" and "for non-profit" illegal use. We can't think that as long as it's not for profit, or with the consent of the portrait owner, we can use the portrait of a citizen at will without making a profit. This understanding is one-sided. Article 100 of China's General Principles of Civil Law stipulates: "Citizens have the right to portrait, and their portraits shall not be used for profit without their consent." Article 139 of "Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues of Implementation (Trial)" defines this kind of infringement as "making advertisements, trademarks, decorating windows, etc. with citizen portraits for profit." . Article 120 stipulates: "If a citizen's right to name, portrait and reputation is damaged, he has the right to demand to stop the infringement, restore his reputation, eliminate the influence, make an apology and claim compensation for the losses." In the non-profit use of other people's portraits without their consent, only the behavior with the reason to stop the infringement is legal. Such as news reports, "wanted orders" issued by public security organs to arrest criminal suspects, and so on. Portrait right, like name right, is an exclusive right. The possession, use and disposal of personal portraits can only be owned by citizens themselves, and no one else can enjoy them without their consent. The act of infringing on the right of portrait is not to use the portrait of a citizen for profit, but to disrespect the exclusive right of a citizen to his portrait. Therefore, for whatever purpose, reproduction, dissemination, exhibition, etc. Citizens' right to portrait should be recognized by citizens, otherwise it will constitute an infringement of the right to portrait. 2. Making portraits of others without authorization (including having photos of others). The act of creating and possessing portraits (photos) of others without my consent. For a photographer, it is the act of taking pictures of others. Portrait is the external expression of citizen's "personality", and only I have the right to decide whether to reproduce my image. Whether portrait works are made (filmed) for public publication or possession does not affect the composition of infringement of portrait rights. In other words, although it is not used publicly, it also constitutes infringement, such as the photo studio printing the customer's photos privately for preservation. Third, maliciously insult and vilify the portraits of others. That is, the actor maliciously insults, vilifies, defiles, damages or destroys the integrity of other people's portraits. Including altering, distorting, burning, tearing up or hanging upside down other people's photos, this kind of behavior not only constitutes an infringement of the right of portrait, but also often constitutes an infringement of the right of reputation. To sum up, with the development of the Internet, the portrait rights of public figures are often violated. It is also illegal to do some business purposes without my knowledge in order to achieve my own private interests. This kind of behavior is also illegal, so I can ask the other party to compensate me for all my losses, so that bad businesses can be severely punished.