What's the difference between full-length photos and incomplete photos taken by SLR cameras? Put two photos together, can you tell which one was taken by which camera? what do you think?

The key is the difference between lens angle of view and sensitivity. These two points have a corresponding relationship and also determine the image quality. The same lens is mounted on two kinds of frames. It must be that the full-frame camera has stronger light sensitivity and larger lens angle because of the limitation of focal length. The bigger the sensor, the more light it can receive, and it has inherent advantages in sensitivity, color and detail reduction.

Of course, there is no difference between ordinary home users and photographers. There are enough pieces at the entry level, but the professional operation of high-end cameras will make them feel troublesome. Many professionals don't like afterimages because SLR is a professional device. If you don't use it or don't intend to delve into it, then this SLR, regardless of the high-end and low-end full-length afterimage, is no different from your mobile phone and card, and it is pure chicken ribs; For professionals and senior photographers, SLR is their production tool, and their favorite thing is definitely to fit themselves perfectly, so they only have eyes for Quan Huafu.

At this point, the contradiction comes out: should the rudiment of entry exist? Because it is useless to professionals and tasteless to amateurs, isn't this thing anti-human? At first glance, it does make sense, but don't forget that professional equipment also represents the threshold, representing high-end and high price, which will shut most people out. But photography is what everyone yearns for, and there are many new people who want to do it at will, like into the pit. Most of these people can't afford it or want to test the water first. This group of people is also a huge market. What shall we do? You can't expect cards and mobile phones to satisfy their desires. Is there a compromise? As a result, the entry-level SLR that conforms to public opinion and business came into being.

Its price is not expensive, high-end professional equipment should also have the same function, and the operation is relatively simple and easy to use. It really satisfies the wishes and curiosity of most civilians and guides a large number of new people to prepare for into the pit. Manufacturers also earn a lot of money, which is killing two birds with one stone.

Therefore, people who deny the existence of the rudiment of entry are either idle or superior. This sense of superiority, commonly known as pretending, you know. Some are from scratch, and some are not short of money and directly enter the whole map. In a word, they kicked the bridge down and threw stones at them, giving full play to the specialty of the sprayer and belittling everything that is not pleasing to the eye.

Have these people ever thought that it is these entry-level products that you despise that support your manufacturers to continue to develop high-end products? After all, you are not a luxury brand like Hasselblad. If we really want to do that, more people will not be able to afford it. Without these entry-level cameras, many a mickle makes a mickle, creating profits, and manufacturers don't know how much they will starve to death. The emergence of entry-level SLR has also promoted the popularity of photography, which can benefit more people. Everyone is from low to high, from simple to complex, so don't forget your roots. You can't look down on grenades just because you have nuclear weapons. You don't need them, but others can.