Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Which is more suitable for post-processing of photography, PVA or IPS screen?

Which is more suitable for post-processing of photography, PVA or IPS screen?

Anything can be done, no problem, the picture upstairs is misleading. First, correct a wrong concept. Panel type is independent of gray scale (8-bit or 6-bit).

Due to the early appearance of TN panel, the driver ic configured in the early stage only supports 6bit, giving people a wrong impression that TN is all native 6bit, and the jitter reaches 8bit. In fact, many TN screens display Zhuo Yi 10000 yuan, and they are all native 8bit. It is the driver IC, not the panel type, that determines the color quality of the display.

If the panel type can determine the display quality, then why can Zhuo Yi NEC dominate the high-end display market?

If you want to choose a suitable post-photography picture, it is suggested to choose from the following points:

Color gamut is generally ARGB. If you have higher requirements, you can display it in ARBG color gamut in advance.

Gray scale, native 8bit is necessary.

Rotating the bracket is actually very important, at least if you have a lot of portrait photos to deal with.

Considering other brands and specific workmanship, the performance changes of general big brands are relatively small, and the quality control is good.

The last point is very important, whether it is rented, bought or borrowed from friends. Please have a colorimeter to calibrate the color temperature, gray scale and brightness of the display (once a month). Uncalibrated and calibrated monitors are two different things (the cheaper the monitor, the more obvious it is)