Fuji xt2 camera bag

The image quality of 1 and Quan Huafu sensor is better than that of half-frame sensor. Mainly reflected in three aspects, first, the depth of field is shallow. Under the same aperture, focal length and shooting distance, the blurring ability of foreground or background is stronger, which is very important in shooting with prominent themes (such as portraits and flowers). ); Second, the high sensitivity is stronger, that is, the imaging ability is better in low light, because the larger the sensor area, the stronger the photosensitive ability of a single pixel, which is very important in night shooting and other subjects; Thirdly, the larger the sensor area, the better the corresponding tolerance (the ability to record the gray scale from white to black, also called dynamic range), which is very important for post-production. However, full-frame cameras are more expensive. The landlord's 9000 budget does not recommend full-frame cameras. Even if you barely start with Quan Huafu fuselage such as A7 or 6D, you can only choose inferior lenses, and the lens accounts for a larger proportion of the image quality (the image quality of half-frame fuselage+bull's head is higher than that of Quan Huafu fuselage+dog's head), while good lenses are more expensive;

2. Fuji's micro cameras are really expensive, especially new products, such as XT2 and XP2. Personally, I don't think there is anything particularly expensive, and the picture quality is not substantially better than those with appropriate prices, such as XT 10, XE2S, XA3. Although it is indeed slightly better in handling, I personally doubt whether these excellent handling are worth a higher price. However, the straight-out quality of Fuji imaging is really excellent. Straight-out quality is Fuji's unique stunt, and the price of Fuji micro-orders is largely due to better straight-out quality. Whether it is worth paying for, everyone has different ideas;

3, the landlord will go straight out as one of the just-needed, Fuji micro-single should still be considered. At present, there are three brands of digital cameras with better quality. One is Leica, but Leica is a luxury in cameras, and the price is relatively expensive. Leica users never talk about cost performance, reflecting a consumption concept; The second one is Oba. Oba's straightness, sharpness and detail reduction are all very good. The color of "Oba Blue" is world-famous, but Oba is only a 4/3 sensor. In the digital age of Big King, the picture quality of 4/3 system is still slightly weaker than that of half-frame sensor; Third, Fuji, Fuji's unique film mode is unique in the industry. Fuji has given full play to the original film technology in digital imaging, and the flatness of Fuji is really good. Therefore, straight out is just needed, and Fuji is a brand that must be considered;

4. Fuji Micro-single suggests to consider XT 10 or XA3. Although Fuji XT2 is equipped with Fuji's most advanced X-Trans CMOS III and X Processor Pro image processors, the static image quality is basically the same as that of X-Trans CMOS II sensor equipped with XT 10, except that the increase of pixels can output larger frames and faster photoelectric signal conversion speed (necessary for 4K video) while ensuring the same details. From the perspective of cost performance and the shooting purpose of the landlord, XT 10 or XA3 fuselage can completely meet the daily shooting needs, and the lens has a greater impact on the image quality. Of course, if you often use a large aperture lens in the sun and don't consider using the nd dimming filter, then 1/8000 shutter is just needed, and the only thing that Fuji XT 10 or XA3 lacks is 1/8000 shutter and (including 4K video). As for XT2, other upgraded controls, such as better viewfinder, dual-card slot design and 325 points,

5. The focusing accuracy of Fuji micro-single is very accurate. As long as you are familiar with the performance of the fuselage and lens, it will not be pasted under normal circumstances. Don't worry.

6. According to the needs of the landlord, Fuji XA3+XF 18mmF2 lens is recommended. Reason: 1, good picture quality. Although XA3 uses a common CMOS sensor developed by Fuji. From the laboratory point of view, the resolution of Fuji common CMOS sensor is slightly weaker than that of X-Trans CMOS sensor, but it is slightly better at the level of color and gray transition, which is considered to be different, but these differences in laboratory environment can be ignored in real shooting. 2.XA3 has a touch focus screen, and you can shoot at the touch of a button. The control mode can be the same as that of a mobile phone, and manual focusing is not required. The landlord is used to the crazy 28mm focal length and shooting method. XA3+ 18mm fixed focus is almost the same as crazy focus and shooting method, but the picture quality is much better. The large aperture of F2 can also create blurred foreground or background. 3. The price is right;

7. It should be noted that XA3 is not an all-metal fuselage, only the top and front cover are made of magnesium alloy, which is insufficient in firmness and all-metal fuselage. The concept of the landlord's requirement for long-term holding is relatively broad, but for ordinary households, the robustness of XA3 is completely applicable to long-term holding.