Consult a photographer. How was this photo taken? Why shoot at the sun? There is no paint in other places without excessive sunlight.

I don't think the light source of this photo is fake. Because the shadow cast by the ridge is in the same direction as the light source, unless the sun is in the current position, there can be no shadow distribution of the ridge in the picture; If the photo is false, not only the sky and the sun will be erased and reconstructed, but also the ups and downs of mountain shadows and sea of clouds will need to be reconstructed. If this is really done by Photoshop, then this person is not only skilled, but also logical, and can calculate several confusing projection relationships in his brain. There are not many such people, but there are definitely many.

From a photographic point of view, this photo needs:

1, suitable shooting time. When the sun rises or sets, the brightness of the sun decreases, which can effectively reduce the illumination contrast;

2. The lens with seven aperture blades was shot by hyperfocal distance with small aperture above F 10. This can be learned from the fourteen stars of the sun and the Quan Jingshen;

There may be two ways to shoot.

1, photographers use powerful and tolerant cameras to shoot, such as Nikon D800 series SLR cameras to record RAW, using spot metering method, and the metering object is the bright lawn; Later, reduce the highlights and brighten the shadows in Camera RAW;

2. If the photographer unfortunately uses a camera with poor tolerance, he can also achieve high dynamic contrast through tripod+surround exposure. The principle of HDR effect is similar to that of HDR effect, but HDR is a soft effect, and bracketing exposure is a hard effect of post-stitching of continuous shooting photos with different exposure levels.