Is the image quality of the Nikon d610 currently purchased worse than that of mainstream cameras?

The Nikon D610 is an entry-level full-frame model with a low price of 24 million. If compared with mainstream machine models, such as mid-to-high-end full-frame models such as the D750 and D810, the pixels are not that big compared to the D750. The difference is that compared to the D810, the pixels are lower. However, pixels cannot fully represent image quality, so in a simple summary, in daily civilian shooting, the image quality of the D610 is not much worse than that of mainstream models.

The sensor size of the D610 is also 35.9mmx24mm, which is the same as the above two mid-to-high-end cameras. It has 24.26 million pixels, which is enough for taking daily photos. If you want to use it to shoot commercials, you should still pursue an expensive camera. You get what you pay for, and it has its advantages. If you are just a photography enthusiast who likes to shoot and play, then the Nikon D610 can completely meet your needs. .

The purpose of shooting definitely determines the requirements for the camera. I am also a photography enthusiast. I bought a D90 10 years ago and still use it now because the photos I usually take are browsed on the computer and on the Internet. So I think the 12 million pixels of the D90 are enough. After all, the D610 is still a full-frame camera and is much better than the D90. So again, it depends on your specific use. You can't see any difference between 24-megapixel and 36-megapixel photos on a computer without looking hard at them, so the D610 is no worse than mainstream models.

As a Nikon user who owns three machines, D90 610 800

Let’s briefly talk about the advantages and disadvantages of D610

Let’s talk about the disadvantages first

1. The display screen on the body is very poor. Beginners may not be able to tell it, but it is much worse than the D800 in my hand.

2. The photos taken of landscapes (especially the blue sky) are prone to color faults, regardless of RGB or sRGB.

3 The shutter speed is only 1/4000 at most, which is embarrassing in extreme cases.

4 The flash synchronization can only be synchronized to 1 when using a ring flash (domestic Weizhuo) for macro photography. /200 and D800 can reach 1/320

5 In terms of compatibility, it is like the original extender + Baiwei. It takes about 1 second to press the shutter and the response is embarrassing

Advantages

1 The body is compact and feels comfortable in the hand

2 The price is cheap

3 The menu inherits Nikon’s ancestral settings and is adaptable to old users

4 The button settings are reasonable and easy to control

5 words have strong battery life and can shoot 90P when fully charged

In addition, D610 supports 1080P 30 frames for video shooting

As an entry-level full-frame, considering its price and comprehensive cost-effectiveness, it is worth owning

The following pictures from the D610 are for reference only

Before I was engaged in indoor space photography, I used a D90 + Tokina 11- 16 is working now, it is D6116-35 14-24

I am D610, shooting portraits. I think it will last for many years.

The main difference is in the controllability and focusing performance. The other differences are not particularly big. The machine is a bit old. If you don’t have money, you can consider buying it. If you have money, you should consider new machines.

When buying a new camera, don’t blindly follow the trend. You should make a choice based on your purpose of photography, what subjects you will shoot in the future, and your own income and expenditure capabilities. If you just want to have fun and don’t want to improve your photography in the future, and you just want to post videos on your friends circle to communicate, the Nikon D610 is still good. This camera is a full-frame camera, and the image quality is better than that of a half-frame camera. If you like photography very much and want to post pictures and communicate on professional photography website forums, participate in photography competitions or contribute to professional photography newspapers, etc., the D610 still has a big gap compared to the D750, D810, and D850 in terms of tolerance, continuous shooting, and functions. If it is for personal use and you love photography very much, it is recommended to choose from the above three models. The D850 is currently the best SLR camera!

I hope my answer can provide you with good suggestions! If you have any questions, talk to me.

I am a D610 user. Although D610 is not commonly used now. The former backup machine became the main machine. The main reason is that the full-frame system is too bulky. Inconvenient to carry. But the D610 is really not bad in terms of picture quality.

The difference in image quality between the D610 and the current new machine is only on paper. The difference in image quality under the same scene and conditions is simply indistinguishable to the human eye. The real gap is reflected in performance

Never doubt the tolerance and high sensitivity of Nikon's cameras. Of course, the newer cameras are better, and the 610 is a full-frame camera, so it won't be any worse. The basic functions of high-end phones are available in entry-level phones, but it is slightly inconvenient in some aspects of use. The low-sensitivity film yield of the 610 is still very high, but the dynamic focus tracking is a bit slow after all, it only has 39 points of focus. And the price is great. If you don’t follow the trend, it can fully meet the needs of still shooting. The 24060 pixels are not stressful to process.

To put it simply, there will be a gap, but it won’t be huge. Because electronic and digital products are always developing from generation to generation. The same concept applies to mobile phones.

In fact, D610 is not bad. This is the light and shadow I took in Xinduqiao last year!