Appreciate the following photographs and write about 300 words to appreciate the text.

The composition is well-behaved, and the subject is placed in a more comfortable position, which conforms to the aesthetic taste of the public.

In terms of exposure, the highlight overflows, which is not a big problem.

The depth of field can also blur the background with a large aperture and highlight the subject. It may be because of the limitation of its own lens that it can't open a large aperture. If possible, the aperture can be larger, and the background will be more comfortable.

The photo shows that the whole is full of green. Bitter gourd is vigorous and powerful in appearance. At first glance, it will make people feel very happy. In popular terms, it is full of positive energy.

But what is the name of the red "boundless sea of suffering"? The name is a bit irrelevant and far-fetched.

Just looking at the photos won't remind people of any boundless suffering, although it is bitter gourd. I think it is much better to call it "bitter gourd" directly, which actually involves the big problem of naming the works. A good title can make the finishing point of a photo, while a poor title will ruin the work itself. There are too many such examples in Mowgli or Hummingbird. I especially hate photos that are obviously photographic sketches, but there is a topic full of social responsibility. It feels like my son who doesn't like washing his face was abruptly pushed into the washbasin by me, not to mention how uncomfortable it was.

In addition, my personal experience is that the backlight effect is the best when shooting this kind of thing, especially for the leaves. Backlight can show the color, outline and texture of leaves incisively and vividly, and the picture is easier to show the atmosphere.

In short, the good pictures are ruined by the title!