SLR video problem, professional theory, please come in.

I feel a little dizzy after reading the description of the landlord n times.

Answer the delay question first:

Time-lapse photography itself has two meanings: 1 Long exposure photos II. Degenerate lens.

The landlord obviously refers to the latter: the degenerate lens. This is a shot that has been shown for a long time in a short time.

Then there are two ways to delay (downgrade) SLR shooting. 1. Crazy photo shoot. 2. Canon crack.

Most people use the former method.

"If I shoot a film at 24fps with the shutter of 1/24, it seems to be stuck, right? What if I use the shutter of 1/96? "

What is a shutter card? You mean video vision, Caton?

Whether the visual card is stuck depends on the number of frames in the video. At first, the film side chose 24P pictures to reduce the cost, while the domestic one was 50I.

24P can only be said to be visually acceptable. The future movie trend is the popularity of 48P and 60P.

So it doesn't matter if you shoot a frame 1/24,110, or even 1S, 10S. Nobody cares how long it takes you to shoot a frame. The key is to keep the video at 24P, and keep 24 videos a second. 1/96, too.

Then answer the video recording question:

The shutter setting is 1/30. What happened to the last 25P?

For example, you can swallow it 25 times a minute, and it takes 1/30 seconds each time. Is there a conflict?

Shutter only affects exposure, of course, affects recording. . . Of course not. . . .

It is suggested that the landlord learn some basic knowledge of SLR. Think again about playing delay. I usually play, and the gadget production is low.