Astromaster 90HT or AstroMaster 130EQ, who is more suitable for entry? Ready to take a SLR for celestial photography.

The entry level is almost the same, and you can't tell the difference between the effects of 80, 90 and 90 90eq. The 130EQ primary mirror of Xingtelang is spherical, with low accuracy and poor cost performance. Star Trang's 90EQ price is also relatively high, and the cost performance is not good. Among the 80,90EQ, the 90EQ of Baode is kind, and the main mirror is nothing outstanding. The equatorial plane is EQ3 grade, which is much better than other EQ 1 grades. Cinda in reflecting telescope is better.

If you want to shoot SLR photography, 80,90EQ is absolutely impossible, because for photography, his bracket is too poor and the focal length is too long (unless you only shoot the moon, which is a difficult target).

You need at least one cinda 130650, one EQ3D, double heel or single heel, and one adapter ring. You can try it.

If you shoot the planet moon, it is recommended to buy a planet camera. It is much better to shoot the planet and the moon with a computer than a SLR, and 80EQ can do it.