Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - Arthur-hegemony: film criticism and plot analysis, a powerful epic expressing heroic legend!

Arthur-hegemony: film criticism and plot analysis, a powerful epic expressing heroic legend!

King Arthur has always been a household name in Britain. In the Middle Ages, a world full of magic, power and greed, the gap between the rich and the poor, no laws and poor education, except for the bad king and evil, everyone was looking forward to the emergence of a hero who would lead everyone to the light, not the oppression of darkness and power, and King Arthur: The legend of the sword is

Script evaluation (ordinary, excellent, exquisite and perfect): exquisite.

In the royal family, there are always tragic stories of being displaced. Because of the desire for power and ambition for the throne, a prince who was taken from the throne and his family were destroyed. He was still in infancy, and he came to the grassroots of society with the river. The prince may be adopted by farmers, woodcutters and fishermen. In the movie, Arthur (played by Charlie China Southern Airlines).

Screenwriters Joby Harold, guy ritchie and Lionel Wigram focus on creating many villains. Wodigan (Jude Law) has a natural evil temperament. His desire for power and ambition made him the soul of the story at all costs. He can push the story forward and let us use it.

The tragic prince has to face not only Wodigan, but also his own fears. He saw his father throw a thin sword into the air to protect the blood clan and the kingship, and put it behind his back to become a sword seat, which protected the continuation of the blood clan and was Arthur's only chance to regain the kingship.

The three screenwriters also gave a vivid description of Arthur's resistance to power because of fear. Just like when we are awakened by a nightmare and close our eyes again, there will always be fragments of the nightmare, so that our eyes will not close, but when we are sleepy, we will close our eyes inadvertently, so we will shuttle back and forth between the two, but in the end, sleepiness will become a winner, as if Arthur passed the mental test and gradually overcame his fear, waving a rapier and confronting Wodigan.

"King Arthur" has been remake several times, but "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword" puts the epic level into people's hearts, and makes the cruel and cold words bloom with blood and admiration in the story. The opposition between good and evil, the struggle for the throne and the illusion of magic are all compressed in the two roles of Arthur and Wadigan. They are a collection of good and evil in this world, but people and emotions are added to it. Epic beautifies cruel history.

Director's evaluation (ordinary, excellent, exquisite and perfect): perfect.

Guy ritchie, who is also a director, has a magnificent image, and every scene of war and fighting is full of solid strength. Especially when Arthur's ability to wield a rapier explodes and hides, the image blooms in moderation. When Arthur faces a one-to-many situation, Ricky puts the camera behind Arthur, which magnifies Arthur himself and strengthens the sense of blow. This medieval world is very real, as if we witnessed everything with our own eyes. Guy ritchie has undoubtedly finished a perfect work.

Actor evaluation (ordinary, excellent, exquisite and perfect): exquisite.

Jude Law is the most important villain in this story. I mentioned in the film review that the story depends on the role. If there is a villain in the role, he will be a very important key. Jude Law just explained this point. Seeing his brother ascend to the throne, he only has greed and desire for the throne, even at the expense of his wife and daughter to enter into a contract with the darkness, even if he holds the power and enjoys the success. However, it seems that he didn't get what he wanted. He was mixed with betrayal and remorse, just to consolidate the kingship. Jude law really explained this trait. Without Jude Law's leadership, Charlie Hunnam's opposition to evil would not be so prominent. Every good actor can lead the story and guide the actors. Jude Law is a good example.

Overall evaluation (ordinary, excellent, exquisite and perfect): exquisite.

Arthur: Hegemony with the Beast is a very successful epic film. The lens is magnificent and realistic, the characters and actors are perfectly matched, and the epic characteristics are vividly displayed. The film can accurately present the details and structure of the epic, but it is very difficult, but Arthur: Fighting with the Beast did it!

?