Which one is better between a SLR camera and a digital camera if they have the same pixels?

If we talk about portability, tx55 wins. But other than that, it has no advantages over SLRs. One term that everyone often misleads profiteers is pixels. Pixels only determine the size of a photo, which means the higher the pixels, the larger it can be enlarged and still remain clear. But everything has a degree. Taking the common mainstream display resolution of 1980*1080 as an example, to display a photo in full screen, only 2 million pixels are used. Therefore, for general purposes, 10 million pixels are not only enough, but also more. Not to mention 16 million pixels.

There is no connection between pixels and imaging. Let’s go back to the two cameras you mentioned. Since the CMOS of the TX55 is much smaller than that of the SLR, it has 16 million pixels densely distributed, while the CMOS of the SLR has a larger size and lacks fewer pixels. From this point of view, the high ISO image quality of this SLR Definitely much better than tx55. In addition, the built-in professional processor, camera cache, camera response speed, professional focusing system, etc. of the SLR are all important features that beat the TX55 instantly, so if you are considering performance, the SLR is undoubtedly your choice.

If you don’t have any requirements for picture quality and just want portability, you’d better go with tx55