Canon 60d+ spittoon or 600D 18- 135 sets of machines.

Canon EOS 60D, which was born on 20 10, and Canon EOS 600D, which was launched on 20 1 1, are old models, which can no longer be seen on the counters of mainstream dealers.

The contrast between the 60D equipped with small spittoon and the 600D equipped with 18- 135 standard lens can be regarded as the battle between Guan Gong and Qin Qiong, or the battle between Guan Gong and Qin Qiong who sells horses.

Canon 60D digital SLR camera, adhering to the original intention of 10D to build a two-digit mid-range camera, puts many technologies applied by single-digit computers on APS-C frame, but it is in an awkward period because of the threshold of cmos technology. However, facing EOS 600D of the same family of cmos (Canon has used the same cmos for several generations), it is in the viewfinder field of view, continuous shooting speed and battery life (1000).

From the fuselage, the difference is like the comfort version and the top version of a car, which can bring users a richer experience. But there is still not much difference in essence. Where's the camera?

Small spittoon is the photographer's nickname for Canon EF 50mm F 1: 1.8. Simple in structure but excellent in effect, it is the first lens for beginners to understand the large aperture. On the APS-C frame, the equivalent focal length is 80mm, which is exactly the focal length of a portrait.

Canon EF-S 18- 135mm and 50/ 1.8 are also the treasures of Canon lenses, which are balanced within the zoom range of seven times, allowing beginners to appreciate the charm of different perspectives. Usually at the entry level as a hanging head, home travel can also cope.

Because the expenses of 60D+50mm and 600D+ 18- 135mm are similar, cash-strapped photographers will face this choice.

20 16 said that these two cameras seem to have changed, but the choice of these two combinations is still meaningful.

SLR camera is a comprehensive technical platform, which is mainly composed of two parts: body and lens. Generally speaking, the user has only one body, but he can constantly change the lens as needed.

Then the question is, under the premise of limited funds, should we choose a better fuselage with a simple lens, or should the fuselage accommodate the lens and maintain common functions?

In addition to the specific use needs (such as portraits or travel mentioned above), the psychological factors of consumption also play a great role.

For an optimist, there is hope for the future, and there will always be new lenses, so instead of making the camera a bottleneck for development when you have the ability to improve in the future, it is better to choose a higher-end camera and expect to have money to replace a better lens in the future.

For a cautious and conservative person, the future income is planned by the future, and solving the existing problems according to the existing conditions is the best choice.

Optimism and conservatism are subjective, but on the basis of objective conditions, everyone's growth experience, education and environmental factors will affect his consumption concept and values. Only when he can clearly understand his own conditions can he avoid being blindly optimistic or too cautious and lead to misjudgment.

Of course, the investment in photographic equipment, if it is not a business need, but a personal interest, will largely depend on personal subjective feelings, and then affect personal future.