Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - JUNG WOO questioned the plagiarism of TFBOYS' new poster. Is it really plagiarism or being framed?
JUNG WOO questioned the plagiarism of TFBOYS' new poster. Is it really plagiarism or being framed?
0 1, feather composition has long existed. Zheng Zheng's Weibo basically exposed some entertainment circles in three days? Melon? , and general this? Melon? They are all actors or artists who have worked with him, but this time he actually? Set fire to your body? I chose TFBOYS with high popularity and popularity, and I don't know what he will think for a while. When he said TFBOYS copied his ideas, he was referring to a set of stills he took for his artists several years ago, which used feather elements. Coincidentally, TFBOYS also has feathers in the group picture, so it's just empty talk. Plagiarism? However, people in Fan Lu are not to be outdone. What early Yi Nengjing and the feather shapes in Hal's Moving Castle were silently taken out? Hit the face? So-called? Plagiarism? .
02. What is the purpose of Zheng Zheng? JUNG WOO has always been a person who can fully realize his goals in public opinion. In other words, he is good at using the storm of public opinion and entertainment circle to win people's hearts. Look at the people who are popular with him, and you will know which one is not in the forefront, just because of his artist's popularity and topicality, regardless of his voice and evaluation. So this time when he sent Weibo, Weibo, the editor, immediately posted the latest photos of the problematic actress. What else? It happened? What a coincidence! The actress has a movie to play recently.
03. If it is plagiarism, it is suggested to go through legal procedures directly. To tell the truth, JUNG WOO is not transparent at all. He doesn't need to make a big splash to gain popularity. He relies on these popularity to defend his rights. Of course, he also has the right to send his own Weibo. That's understandable, but? Empty talk? Our behavior is unreasonable anywhere. Even if pictures are released, many people think that there is not much similarity except feathers, and the photographer who took pictures later came out to explain the artistic conception and ideas of composition, which is quite generous. To say the least, I saw that all the fans said that it was a real infringement and supported him to sue Li Fei.
Judging from the current situation, there is no real hammer for plagiarism. JUNG WOO just said that he just wanted to do an experiment to see how everyone would react if the object of discussion was top traffic. Whether it is an experiment or not, such behavior is really puzzling, not to mention fans, even passers-by feel strange. It's better to eat melons carefully. Of course, we should take rights protection seriously.
- Related articles
- 1905, China began to make his own films. What was the movie made at that time?
- What are the requirements for submitting photographic works?
- Where is Yangzhou Bailong Temple?
- Brief Introduction of Lu Xun, Bing Xin and Edison
- Scottish photographer comments on China
- What about Shanghai Dishan Industrial Co., Ltd.?
- What kind of background cloth is the best for jade shooting?
- What do you mean by scattered light? The light from the balcony with the window closed, right?
- How to evaluate the movie Out of Amazon?
- Information about Sister Furong?