Nikon 14-24 and 16-35, how to choose?

I happen to have these two in my hand. Tell me about my personal experience.

Mainly shooting indoor space, occasionally shooting architecture and scenery.

These two heads are both gold-rimmed lenses, but the difference is 1424. This light bulb is three yuan big, with an aperture of 2.8, which is very cool to hold again.

1635 is one of the small three elements of aperture 4, which is lighter and easier to filter.

The picture quality is definitely better than 1424+0635.

Distortion control is not very satisfactory for both heads. The large space is fine, but the edge distortion after correction in the small space is not very good.

Anti-glare 1635 feels better (probably due to the addition of mcuv).

It is very important to have a focal length of 2mm, otherwise we will not pay attention to the old frog 12mm, which is called zero distortion.

It depends on personal needs. You can have both.

In addition, Longteng's 15-30 f2.8 g2 lens is recommended, which is enough to meet the ultra-high pixel of Nikon d850, and the rear filter scheme is more economical.

How to choose two shots? We should know their characteristics first, and then make a choice after comparison. ...

These two models are Nikon's ultra-wide-angle zoom lenses, and they are also relatively new lenses with nano-coating technology. 14-24 was released earlier. From the law of the development of science and technology, it is obvious that 16-35 will make people more confident, but most people can't see some changes brought by science and technology with the naked eye. ...

The aperture of 12-24 is one step larger. In the era of digital photography, the luminous flux of the first aperture can be basically ignored, but the change of depth of field brought by the first aperture is still obvious. At this point, 12-24 is dominant. As for the focal length of 2mm, you can get almost the same perspective as long as you take a small step back, but the gap between 24 and 35 is still obvious, and the perspective changes a lot.

In terms of weight, 12-24 is obvious. Because of the shape of the light bulb, the normal filter can't be used, but whether the filter is necessary can also be discussed. ...

Needless to say, even by weight, 12.24 will be more expensive, or even twice as expensive, which many people like to consider. ...

As for the inevitable barrel distortion of wide-angle lens, personally, 14-24 is well controlled, while 16-35 is not. Borrowed, there is no real comparison, but it is not too bad according to reason. ...

My suggestion: those who want to decorate things choose the former, those who want to exercise choose the former, and those who want to control the depth of field choose the former; Want to choose the latter lightly, want to sweep the street with a lens, and want to save money. ...

Finally, I want to say that 12-24 is made in Japan. Why do you say that? Hehe, you know. ...

Do you want to consider aperture? The maximum constant aperture of 14~24 is 2.8, and that of 16~35 is 4. Of course, 14~24 is definitely more expensive and heavier than 16~35. If you think that the weight is not particularly important and you like a large aperture, it is recommended to choose 14~24. If you want to choose a cheaper aperture, it is recommended to choose a pair.