The stewardess issued underwear photos at work, was fired from the company, and sued the company in a rage. How about the sentence?

The flight attendant took a selfie in underwear during work and sent it to the WeChat circle of friends, which was expelled by the airline. Therefore, the incident of bringing the company to court caused concern. On May 7th, the reporter learned from China Judgment Document Network that the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court held that the flight attendant Guo wearing underwear to make friends in the cabin was harmful to social atmosphere, public order and good customs, and violated the flight attendant's code of conduct and professional image. At the same time, because of its violation of cabin safety duties, the labor contract does not constitute illegal termination.

As a result of the court's judgment, the court held that an airline is a public air transport enterprise with strong industry particularity. Because public air transport involves the public safety of unspecified people, airlines bear a high degree of safety responsibility, so it is reasonable for an airline to implement stricter rules and regulations and management norms. Guo took a selfie during the flight duty, and engaged in private affairs during the duty, which violated his obligation to ensure the safety of the cabin.

Although there was no safety problem in the final flight, this behavior was intolerable for the need of putting flight safety management first. Moreover, Guo's identity is open in the circle of friends, and the indecent photos released are harmful to the social atmosphere, public order and good customs, and violate the code of conduct and professional image of flight attendants, which will inevitably cause a bad social demonstration effect and affect the public's trust in the safety reputation of an airline. Therefore, it is considered that the termination of labor relations by an airline due to Guo's serious violation of regulations is the embodiment of exercising the right to operate according to law and does not constitute illegal termination.

The performance of a labor contract shall comply with professional norms, public order and good customs. As a special enterprise responsible for people's travel safety, it is reasonable for airlines to adopt a "zero tolerance" attitude towards behaviors that affect flight safety. Starting from the value orientation of maintaining civil aviation safety and ensuring people's life safety, this case concludes that Guo's personal affairs during his work violated his safety duties, and that an airline's act of canceling the contract was legal, which played a good demonstration role in practicing the socialist core values of loving their posts and being dedicated.

Conclusion Although Guo is not a public figure, his personal image, words and deeds will have a great impact on his work and the public because of his work attributes and the number of people he has to face.