10 thousand cameras

The one upstairs is p. . . My personal suggestion is to buy Canon's 50D+ 18-200 lens or 550D+24- 105F4 or 550D+ 17-40F4.

Let's start with the camera. 50D is a mid-range machine, and 550D is an entry-level machine. Functionally, it is definitely better and more professional than the 50D, but the two are not worlds apart. Neither is the full-frame machine. In my opinion, the difference between full-width machine and incomplete machine is a world of difference. However, the operation of 50D is more professional. If LZ wants to develop in this field, he can practice in 50 days.

550D is also good. For machines with the same frame, the camera itself is not the decisive factor, but the lens is. Many times, the same lens, the difference between 50 D and 550 D will be very small. But as I said before, 50D has many functions that 550D doesn't have, and their operability is not the same.

The advantage of choosing 550D is that you have more money to buy lenses. Let's talk about the lens first

The lens I am using now is 18-200. The biggest advantage of this lens is its convenience. Especially when traveling, imaging is meaningful. Moreover, this head has a wide angle. I believe it will be used a lot when shooting scenery. In case you want to take a close-up of seagulls, the telephoto end of 200 can fully meet your needs.

I have also used these two heads,17-40,24-105, with red circles. Personally, 17-40 is really the best! The imaging is awesome! The wide angle of 17 is very cool and suitable for shooting magnificent scenery, but the disadvantage is that the maximum focal length is only 40, so it is not easy to take any close-ups.

24- 105, this head is also a red fist. The so-called red circle, originated in Japan, has a red circle at the front of the lens. However, 24- 105 imaging is quite satisfactory, not bad. Close-ups and portraits can be taken at the end of 105, and F4 maximum aperture is fully available. The wide angle is only 24, which is not enough. This is his shortcoming.

But you should know that imaging and focal length are contradictory. If the imaging is good, the focal length span will definitely be small and the focal length will be particularly wide, and the imaging will definitely decline. 18-200 imaging is definitely not as good as 24- 105.

Of course, some people may mention 18- 135, and finally say this. To tell the truth, this lens is very convenient, but the imaging is not as good as 18-200. It is absolutely theoretical to say that they are imaged the same! ! ! Since you have 1W, make good use of it. Don't be petty when buying a camera lens, you will regret it. Now that you have prepared the funds, you should spend them well, and don't spend money on regrets.

It's all typed word by word ~ ~ I hope it will help you.