Niaotu photography

I have version C of XJ 100-400 and Sigma 150-600. You can talk about the use feeling. At first, I used a Hummer 150-500+7D to shoot birds. The definition of that end is average, a little out of focus, and it was accidentally broken when it was used. Later, I bought the Sigma 150-600S version. After upgrading the base firmware, this lens has no out-of-focus phenomenon, good definition, good image quality and strong protection ability. It is all-metal structure, but the disadvantage is that it is heavy, 2.9 kg. Because sometimes hunting is inconvenient, I moved the idea of buying Dabai. Dabai 100-400 weight 1.5 kg, good definition and good image quality. Shooting kingfisher is short and can only shoot more than ten meters away. The bird in the picture is relatively small, and the picture quality is rough after cutting. So 600mm is the most suitable length. Why did you buy the 150-600C version again? Because the camera has high sensitivity except 1DX2. When the Fit version requires the speed of 1600-2000/ s, the high sense can't get up, and the ISO3200 has a heavy sense of noise, so the idea of changing the door was put forward. Originally planned Nikon D500+ 150-600C version. Due to the price increase of D500, D7500+ 150-600C version is temporarily used. The advantage of this group is light weight, about 2.5 kg. The price is cheap. And Nikon cameras can be cut wide by X 1.3 times. The advantage is that 600mm becomes equivalent to 900 mm, and it can be shot from a long distance. The picture quality of this lens is not much different from that of the S version, and the price is more than 4,000. Of course, the protection is worse than the S version, not all metal, dustproof and waterproof. It's never good to reuse the S version. Send out some C-version proofs for real shots.

If only from the perspective of shooting ecological birds, I recommend the 150-600 lens of Sigma.

The original white lens is quite good in terms of lens body collocation or imaging, but we know that ecological photography still has certain requirements for equipment, especially bird photography. I think the longer the focal length, the better. After all, birds are not like other subjects, and the focal length of 400 and 600 on the lens is the initial focal length of bird photography, so I recommend Sigma 150-

Sigma's 150-600 lens has two versions, which are divided into C version and S version. Let's not talk about complexity. Let's talk about it in a popular way. C version is more suitable for amateur shooting and cheaper. The lens is slightly ordinary, and the Opportunities version is more professional. It is most suitable for sports and ecological photography. The lens of the lens is better, and the price is over 10,000, which is almost white. If you are economical, I especially like shooting birds. You can consider the professional version. After all, it is better, and the imaging is better. Of course, if friends like to shoot ecological themes, but the budget is limited, the C version is also completely possible.

Generally speaking, if you don't like bird photography very much, I recommend the original Canon lens of 100-400, which is a good lens that people won't regret.

The above is my opinion, welcome friends to add.

Of course, using Canon APS-C frame fuselage (such as 7DII) can get the blessing of 1.6 coefficient, which is equivalent to 640mm focal length. The premise is that you have to accept that APS-C has no high pixels, and cropping will lead to a greater reduction in photo pixels ... Now we have a 32.5-megapixel C 90D body, and Canon has developed this C-high-pixel snapshot SLR body, which has filled more than 10 million yuan. There is no vacancy in the original factory for the full-width 500/600mm SLR zoom lens.

Before, the teacher replied that the focusing speed of the non-original 600mm Quan Huafu SLR zoom lens was not as good as that of the original lens. The original question is (Canon 135 Quan Huafu SLR body is available? ) mainly used to shoot birds. It is not only necessary to pat a bird with a bracket. Still need to add Canon's original 100-400mm zoom lens and C-shot SLR 90D body, kill two birds with one stone = with standby machine +C-shot equivalent 160-640mm viewing angle of 30 million pixels12 screen 10.

If the problem is that the newly bought SLR body and lens are specially used for shooting birds, then buy a second-generation10g lens with a weight of 20 150-600mmF5-6.3 from JD. COM's self-operated 8999 yuan. The hand-held weight and performance quality are between the MMC version and S version of Sigma 150-600, and the cost performance is super high. Buy a second-hand 1DX.

Judging from the matching between the lens and the fuselage, the original lens is definitely better than the deputy factory; From the adaptability of theme, Sigma 150-600 is better than Canon 100-400.

The focusing speed, image quality and portability of Canon 100-400II are beyond doubt. Its biggest disadvantage is that its focal length is too short to be in tune with birds. Wild birds have the characteristics of high vigilance, small size and fast speed, which often leads to the photographer being at least 50 meters away from the shooting target. When shooting a bird 50 meters away, it is inevitable that the subject needs to be greatly reduced in the later stage, and it is also inevitable that the details of the subject are blurred with great probability. Therefore, even the propaganda of manufacturers has not made this theme clear.

Of course, using Canon APS-C frame fuselage (such as 7DII) can get the blessing of 1.6 coefficient, which is equivalent to 640mm focal length. The premise is that you have to accept that the APS-C body has no high pixels, and cropping will lead to a greater reduction in photo pixels.

Sigma 150-600 is divided into C version and S version, and S version is heavier, better and more expensive. Since Sigma released a new product with model 35/ 1.4, a series of lenses in the later period are famous for their sufficient materials and high definition. 150-600 is no exception, and it is the super-long zoom lens with the best quality at this price. The market is large and the players have a good reputation.

My personal suggestion is: if shooting birds is not the main theme, but you have time to do it several times, then go to Canon100-400; On the contrary, go to Sima 150-600.

Although 400 can shoot birds, it needs a longer focal length to highlight birds, which is why 400mm lens is not recommended.

There are two kinds of lenses of Sigma 150-600, one is version C and the other is version S, and the positioning of the two lenses is different. The focusing speed of the C version lens is obviously not as fast as that of the S version, but it is cheap. If it is shooting birds, it is not recommended, and you are worried about the sword heel.

I hope my answer can give you some help, thank you.

Canon 100-400mm has never been used, only Sima 150-600mm has been used. When shooting birds, it seems that 100-400mm is a little short, but 150-600mm is sometimes not long enough. Besides, if you are just a fan,

Buy the right horse. As long as the image quality and focus are not too old products, the focal length determines everything. Shooting birds requires a long focal length. It doesn't matter that the aperture can be narrowed.

Friends who shoot birds around these two shots have used them. From the actual use, it is recommended to choose the original 100-400 mm lens. On the one hand, the focusing speed is better than Yima lens, on the other hand, the imaging quality is better than Yima and other sub-factory lenses. Even if the focal length is smaller than that of a horse, the photos taken and cut out are good. When shooting static birds, the focusing speed of the deputy factory lens is not obvious compared with the original lens, but when shooting high-speed birds, the focusing speed is obviously not as good as that of the original lens. Therefore, if you want to shoot a better bird work, it is better to choose the original lens.

There is an original factory complex on 100-400.

Sigma 150-600