Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography and portraiture - A pro-British person's point of view is that they will not get old.
A pro-British person's point of view is that they will not get old.
Peter Jackson and his crew spent hundreds of hours filming the old scenes of World War I, some of which were washed clean, all black or all white, and some white spots or black spots were almost invisible. However, they made it look … well, look at the trailer. Among many other things, they spend time calculating at what speed they should project, because at that time, movie cameras were all shot by hand, so things were likely to project at distorted speed. It took them some time to make it look just right. In addition, 25 minutes after the movie started, they added color to the movie.
This color has a bad reputation, especially considering that ted turner put a lot of pressure on movies in the 1980s, and colored the classic black-and-white movies (especially those considered as models of black-and-white movies) left and right, and put them on the video when the original became difficult to find. Sometimes they make mistakes, such as this movie, the first full-color movie:
Maybe they don't know that Stan Laurel is a ginger. Deleting scenes from a 2 1 minute movie (probably for Time) certainly doesn't help. Of course, legendary movies have been greatly improved in this process, because they have chosen more public domain movies (such as their widely acclaimed Reefer Madness). These movie lovers may not like the black and white version of the original, including the black and white version of the original. The change of this theme has destroyed all this:
They put a lot of thought into making it look more accurate. Peer Peer Jackson actually has a collection of WW 1 uniforms, which have an exact olive (or other required colors) shadow on the actual uniforms. In addition, land and actual land are mutually referenced. Sometimes, Peter Jackson will take photos of their real location and this area, so everything will go smoothly. We can even see Quakers swallowing their cereal boxes. Watching it on YouTube is not enough to show how amazing it looks. After watching the DVD, it seems that they have changed from a stock shot to something that is likely to be filmed recently, and it is more seamless than the corresponding scene in the Wizard of Oz. There are even some modern lenses inserted in it, and the lens of a hundred years ago is perfectly integrated with it. Moreover, as a reward, it looks a bit like the automatic coloring process used by a few color photographers who take action photos.
And added sound. In addition to the audio of real soldiers telling their experiences, Jackson also filmed some scenes where people seemed to be talking, hired a professional lip reader to interpret what they said, and actually hired a voice actor from the same part of Britain to say these words. More commonly, they also extracted recordings of artillery shells from Peter Jackson's collection and some military exercises from the New Zealand army to increase the number of millions of people. In one scene, an officer is reading a propaganda speech to the soldiers in line. Jackson took the time to identify the relevant troops and the shooting date, and then checked whether there were any propaganda statements published in the Imperial Archives that day. Once they find one, they invite an actor to give a speech.
Then they did it to shoot 100 hour epoch video, and then they put it in a movie for 99 minutes. But, of course, this is not the only reason for this great movie.
The film itself If you don't know all the efforts they made to revive the war, you may imagine that this is a Ken Burns-style documentary. Here, we can still see photos (even some vague old shots) about the action (in this case, the First World War), a narrator reviewing history, and some famous actors reading documents to help put the action into action. Maybe in this case, it will have some letters from Lord kitchener to read Stephen Fry or Wilfred Owen's poems to read rupert everett. This is not that kind of documentary.
Without narration, Peter Jackson decided not to do this in the pre-production. On the contrary, most of the dubbing (except the above dubbing dialogue, in fact, most of it is in the environment) comes from the recording of real soldiers telling their experiences. Part of the reason is that there are so many people that determining everyone's identity becomes too distracting. So, they didn't. Just like the scene of the drummer Hodge in History Boy, it resonated. In fact, this method has nothing to do with this film. This is not about the voices of Ypes, Somme, 19 14, 19 18, drummer Hodge, private Tommy Atkins, or any soldier used in the movie. It's all about them. The date is not important, the place is not important, and the name is not important. Peter Jackson learned some materials from the major battles, and made great efforts towards the end of the film, because he thought that there would not be much difference between the nearby battles when the war started or ended.
This is about the general life of these soldiers and boys. I say boys, because many of them are just boys. You may remember the scene in the last episode of "Black Gada". George talked about skipping all the way to the admissions office, playing neat games with his nine alumni, and queuing up to sign up at the same time? Then he found out that he was the last person alive in the newspaper? It won't matter in a few hours. Many of these young people, some as young as 16, may be younger (they are not mentioned in this film). Not only did the army accept them, but many recruiters also suggested how to lie about their age correctly to make some of them more cautious.
It refers to those of us history teachers who really participated in World War I. Your general impression is that many of them are just sitting in the trenches, waiting for someone to look up so that others may be shot. Most of them, of course, but more. Occasionally, I will see them set up studios with each other, especially in the early days. It seems that they are almost like camping. They are in enough danger to keep things excited, or have fun during the break, play "the way of tipping is long", or play some sports games, or even steal watches from dead soldiers. But we have many unpleasant details. One thing is to read the information about the western front quietly and listen to Paul Ballmer talk about how to get used to using the toilet in front of other soldiers. I personally fill in the blanks with the scene of Fort parrish (because I was 14 years old and didn't have many frames of reference). Here, we see several soldiers sitting on an old, simple fence post in trousers. Although we don't really see dirty evidence, sometimes that article will collapse, leading to predictable results. From talking about dealing with lice and burning lice with cigarettes, hearing their eggs pop like popcorn, to seeing the results of trench feet, everything has become dirtier, which almost reminds me of my favorite Knicks series. If it weren't for its background in America, I would promote it here more. Nevertheless, they still maintain the British accent, even if they begin to get rid of the pressure of having to deal with all the problems,
Anyone who studies the time of World War I knows how meaningless this is:180,000 people died (more than10,000 in Britain alone), and there is nothing to prove except a large number of casualties. A Europe that became less stable to the east of the Machnow Line, and the rise of a large-scale anti-war movement, are all because of how terrible all this is. All this illustrates this point. Earlier, they talked about such things, such as making a white feather a so-called sign of cowardice for casual men, even if they are too young to join, even if they are actually Germans (Jeffrey Reagan's Military Anecdote, page 55), even if they are war heroes on the way to hold a banquet for themselves. Earlier, a soldier said that in the football match, coincidentally, Britain played against Germany. They also announced that England had declared war on Germany in the real midfield. The German delegation then announced that for them, the war would begin tomorrow.
At the same time, in the end, the returning soldiers were completely alienated from the civilians they had been with. Many of them know nothing but being soldiers, but private employers often warn that "soldiers don't have to apply". When they try to talk to their old friends who didn't take part in the war, ordinary people just can't get what they have experienced. They just feel dirty and smelly when they come back (really disgusting, like they are covered with lice) and never think about it. Nobody talks about war, except the dialogue between veterans. Just like I heard that Vietnam veterans returned from the war, except this time, they won, and they didn't participate in many of my activities (unless my research on World War I missed some very open and severe condemnation of British atrocities), they were still excluded. Surprisingly, there is no similar stereotype on the returned tomboy. They were hit by shells, which easily triggered a series of violent incidents.
Really, if you have a little, cross it out. Even if World War I is not worth mentioning, this movie is still worth watching. As I explained, it depicts life in the trenches, which is an amazing picture both visually and literally.
- Related articles
- Descriptors of photographic works
- How does Shi Sheng Fanghua fire protection system pass 3 plus 2?
- Is zhoukou normal university a good two?
- What interesting places are there near Lishui?
- How much is the top photographic equipment?
- How to Improve the Interest of Physics Teaching in Senior High School
- Zhu Zhiwei (Hong Kong Living Environment Concept Asia Strategy Coordinator (Guan Ying's husband)) Details
- Where can I get a photographer's card in Wuhan?
- Fugu photography studio
- How to adjust Tindal effect?