Is Nikon D90 good or not?

Compared with the current new camera, the D90 mainly has lower pixels, and the limitation of later cropping is even greater when developing large photos. The processor is a little old. JPG is not as accurate as D7000 or D5 100, so it doesn't matter if it is produced by RAW. In terms of high sensitivity, although the noise reduction algorithm of the old processor is not good, it is still passable thanks to the low pixel per inch.

Compared with the entry-level SLR (the D90 is only an advanced entry-level SLR), the D90 has an advantage in maneuverability, with a slightly faster continuous shooting speed and a slightly lower shutter lag. This can still be felt after use. The viewfinder of pentaprism is brighter than D3 100/5 100, and it will be more comfortable to use in dark light. The fuselage material is better.

Generally speaking, the D90 is not cost-effective, and it has no advantages in all aspects compared with the 60D, which is several hundred dollars more expensive. Compared with D5 100, which is several hundred yuan cheaper, it has advantages but can't completely win. Generally speaking, it is only a penny. If you are not a big fan of Nikon, personal advice may wish to consider adding a few hundred dollars for 60 days.

I hope my answer is useful to you.