Is it better to choose 90D or 6d2 for traveling scenery?

If telephoto is needed, 90D will have great advantages.

On the contrary, the disadvantage is that at the wide-angle end, the ultra-wide angle of the residual lens is not as good as that of Quan Huafu's red circle.

Efs only has an old 10-22 and a new 10- 18.

If it is not a red circle, the coating will be almost the same, and you can feel it in the backlight.

The suitable scenes mentioned above are generally scenery photography, shooting birds and animals and other themes.

As for portraits, it is not particularly important whether they are drawn or not, but the lens needs to be considered.

Quan Huafu's scale is basically a red circle, and the budget will be greatly increased.

If the RP or R of DIGIC8 still recommends the full picture,

The new generation of processors has many improvements over the previous generation.

I suggest buying a 6D2 machine. After buying 90, I still want to go to the whole picture. After all, the lens group is different, and the data of 90 devices is very good. But you have to understand that the lens it faces is these things, either out of focus or pulling bellows or small aperture. No matter how good the data is, it will definitely not get into the whole picture. 90 is still an Aps, and it will definitely not be compared with the whole picture.