Which is better, film camera or SLR?

question 1: what are the advantages of film cameras over digital cameras? In some areas, the current digital still can't replace film.

For example, the grain of the film is constant, but with the increase of the exposure time, the noise in the photos obtained by the digital camera will gradually increase, so the film is irreplaceable in the application of astrophotography and landscape photography with long exposure in minutes.

At present, a few magazines, such as National Geographic, only accept the submission of reverse films, but it is estimated that it will be several years before digital photos are fully accepted.

an EOS5 prototype mid-range film camera is only about 5 yuan as a second-hand machine at present, which can be said to be very valuable.

= = = =

Discuss with friends on the first floor. In fact, when it comes to tolerance, film is not necessarily good. Professional reverse films, especially things like Kodak, are actually a little underexposed, but the tolerance is actually only most black-and-white films and color negative films.

question 2: why is film still better than SLR? as a staunch film user, I have a pentax film SLR and a pentax digital SLR. As a two-machine party, you have more say.

why use film?

The film is cheap

The cheapest Kodak color plus is basically 15 rolls. If you count 36 rolls, you can develop 2 rolls (scan the film yourself). The basic cost is 1 yuan, and the advanced ProFoto 1,4 rolls cost less than 2 yuan.

Digital seems to have no cost, but how expensive is the machine? Even if the price of a medium package machine is 7 yuan. And my film machine was bought from Japan for only 18 yuan, and it was still an antique in the 197s, and there was no problem with its function.

In addition, I will refrain from shooting films, because there are only 36 films, and it will definitely not be a sudden continuous shooting, while it is normal to go out and shoot more than 2 digital films at a time, and the time cost of going home to sort out photos is very high, which is annoying! ! The most important thing is that there are only 36 films, so I will carefully consider the exposure and composition before shooting, and whether this is what I want to shoot, so the success rate is very high. At present, I can basically achieve a film output rate of more than 5%, which I can never achieve digitally.

Film is the product of photography development for more than 1 years, which has basically reached the extreme of image, while the performance of electronic equipment doubles every 18 months, so I need to constantly pursue new models in order to pursue better quality.

Reliable film

Film has a high tolerance, and it is not a big problem to be exposed at all, and it is difficult to make up for the timely raw format on digital SLR. Especially when shooting in natural wind, it is easy for film to cope with large light ratio. Digital SLR basically does not have all kinds of polarization and color filters, so it can't produce scenery films. So the film is more like the human eye.

Feelings

The film's unknowability of the results gives people more expectations, rather than pressing the shutter to know whether it is successful or not. The success of shooting gives the film photographer a greater sense of accomplishment, and the failure also gives the photographer a better chance to sum up. In digital photography, the failed photos were basically deleted at that time, and it was difficult to improve themselves.

of course, there are more, so I won't say much. Too much melodramatic talk.

Second, why use digital

In some cases, digital

is necessary, such as news interviews and commemorative photos of family and friends, and photos need to be submitted in time. Sports scenes and animal shooting require a lot of technical assistance, and the failure rate is relatively high. The film really can't be hold.

Full digitization is convenient for the later stage.

This doesn't explain.

Convenience

Convenience is sometimes an advantage, and sometimes it is a disadvantage, but it is undeniable that we will know what it is like immediately after shooting, reducing a lot of work repetition.

question 3: what is the difference between a paraxial film camera and a SLR film camera? Mainly in the form of framing and focusing. SLR cameras are not necessarily "only" focal-flat curtain shutters (for example, the SLR cameras of Kangtai Flex series, Fu Lunda, Aikefa and other brands produced in the 195s are all inter-mirror shutters; Similarly, the paraxial cameras are not all mirror shutters. For example, Leica's paraxial cameras, Zeiss' Contax series cameras and Soviet FEDER series paraxial cameras are all curtain shutters ...)

There are references to related issues below, and I believe the contents are all related. If you have any questions, you can add them and we will discuss them again.

you can refer to:

zhidao.baidu/question/118292231's

About the difference between the actual operation of a paraxial camera and a SLR camera-mainly focusing on framing

you can refer to the original post that is not empty and copied, but all targeted. Copy and copy your own:

What does zhidao.baidu/question/1999669 mean by SLR camera

What is the macular focusing of paraxial camera in zhidao.baidu/question/1195316? Where is the macula?

What's the difference between this kind of camera and ordinary camera by zhidao.baidu/question/1935721

Some problems about film paraxial framing by zhidao.baidu/question/12162399

Question 4: Which is better, film SLR camera or digital SLR camera? Film SLR cameras and digital SLR cameras exist in the market, which naturally have their own reasons:

1. For film SLR cameras, silver halide fine particles (35mm film) are used to record photo information in analog form, and the area of 35mm film contains about 1 billion effective particles to record photo information. It is equivalent to 1 billion pixels of a digital camera. Compared with the resolution of the current top digital camera and film SLR camera, there is no way to compare it.

Therefore, the current film SLR camera is generally used for taking beautiful photos that need to be enlarged greatly.

2. Digital SLR camera, At present, the display/transmission/output of photos generally does not exceed their resolution. Therefore, more than 6 million photos can basically meet the daily and even professional needs. The advantages of digital SLR cameras are also obvious, without developing, instant display and instant transmission ... So for general applications, Digital SLR cameras have greatly exceeded the application scope of film SLR cameras.

Question 5: Which is better? The biggest difference between digital cameras and film cameras is the photosensitive element behind the shutter, while digital cameras are image sensors, and the other is film.

The film has the advantages of large tolerance and good quality, but it is troublesome to develop and print, and it can't always check the shooting effect, so it needs a lot of experience to be skillfully used.

The disadvantage of a digital camera is its low latitude, but the shooting quality needs to be determined according to the size and pixels of the photosensitive element, so it can be viewed directly on the computer without printing, and the shooting effect can be viewed at any time when shooting.

In terms of image quality, the best camera is the large-format camera, followed by SLR camera, ordinary 35MM film camera and digital camera. In terms of portability, digital camera has more advantages. You should make your own consideration on the specific situation.

question 6: what is the difference between a film camera and a SLR and a digital camera? In fact, it is the difference between the back of the camera. Take the highest-end 645 camera as an example, these cameras can replace the film back and the digital back, which means that the same camera can use both digital and film. The difference between digital and film is related to two points, one is the image quality, and the other is the way of shooting.

Strictly speaking, film records light and shadow better than digital. Because the contrast, resolution and color of the film come from the chemical characteristics of the medicine on the film, the resolution recorded on the film will be higher, the color transition will be richer and the tolerance will be greater. For example, from red to orange, there may be 1 levels of numbers and 1 levels of film. In a word, if you think of the photosensitive element imaging as jpg, then the film is bmp.

but the advantages of film also come at a price. First of all, film shooting on a non-SLR camera can't be previewed by what you see is what you get, and even on a SLR camera, you can't browse the pictures already taken. All the shooting results have to be developed in a darkroom to know. Therefore, film shooting often requires more photographic experience, otherwise it is easy to waste films. At the same time, many photographers will try several sets of aperture and shutter combinations when shooting film, and they will also carry a lot of film with them. Then the later stage of film shooting must be done in a dark room, instead of PS on the computer like us. If you have to do the latter, you must scan it into the computer with the help of an advanced negative scanner and then process it. And digital can overcome these problems.

So to put it bluntly, film cameras and digital cameras are a compromise between shooting difficulty and imaging quality.

question 7: which is the better imaging effect, SLR film camera or SLR digital camera? There is no doubt that digital camera, if this problem was put into 1 years ago, digital camera would be regarded as a joke. Five years ago, the film could not laugh, but now the film has been completely driven out of the 135 field and only exists in the hands of some players, which does not occupy the mainstream position.

The resolution and latitude of digital cameras have completely surpassed those of film cameras in the 135th era.

question 8: is the film camera still worth using now? 1. The charm of film can't be surpassed by current digital technology (I don't know whether it can be surpassed in the future), especially the color expression and color tolerance of film;

2. Nowadays, digital imaging is proud of being able to simulate film imaging;

3, 645, though very good, are still digital. At present, digital technology, even medium-sized imaging, still can't catch up with 135 film, let alone medium-sized and large-sized film.

4. The cost of playing with film is very high. In addition to film cameras like AE1 and films with different sensitivities and imaging styles, developing equipment, including hardware and consumables, is also needed.

5. To learn film shooting, you must first learn the development technology, and it is not recommended to use film without learning development. Developing technology is like digital post-technology. If you don't know digital post-technology, you can't play DSLR well, and if you don't know developing technology, you can't play film well.

6. if you only shoot with film and then go to Kodak store to develop it, it's not called playing with film. it's better not to use film.

7. Children's shoes upstairs said that most of the high-quality award-winning photos were taken with film, and only half of them were right. The other half was that they all developed their own films.

Question 9: What brands of film cameras are good Lycra, Lulai, Hasselblad, Kangtaishi, Canon and Nikon? .................