Which is better for taking pictures, Canon or Nikon?

Canon and Nikon are world leaders in SLR cameras. Which one to take pictures of? I think it's better to use my own photography skills and creativity to improve my photography level for the cameras of the two brands that are evenly matched.

In Canon and Nikon SLR camera brands, there is a saying called "Canon portrait, Nikon scenery". It should be that the former is softer and the latter is sharper. Since there is such a statement, it is certainly not groundless. So as a photographer, you can choose according to your own needs.

Of course, it doesn't mean that Canon can't take pictures of scenery and Nikon can't take pictures of people. Just a slight advantage. What's more, these can be adjusted later.

I personally use Nikon, and I think Nikon is very easy to use. Because there was a digital camera from the beginning, I used Nikon brand. I was familiar with Nikon's control, so I didn't replace it. If there are no special circumstances in the future, I will always use Nikon. I'm still single-minded Ha ha.

Welcome to click on the avatar above to follow me, thank you.

If your level is still asking this question, in fact, Canon and Nikon are not much different for you, and even you may shoot better with your mobile phone.

In fact, the camera is just a tool, and any kind of camera can shoot good works. The key depends on the person who uses the tool. Besides, Nikon and Canon are both Japanese products, neck and neck.

Huawei p 10puls shooting Canon 1DsMarklll shooting.

In fact, Nikon and Canon are first-class brands, and which one to use is purely a personal hobby. I like Nikon, so I use Nikon camera. At present, the market price is very transparent, and you get what you pay for. People don't know the goods and know the money, so it's expensive. No matter what kind of equipment, as long as you practice hard, take long shots and master the essentials of taking pictures, then you will be a blockbuster.

Nikon and Canon have their own strengths and are neck and neck. Canon imaging is soft, and sports photography is widely used; Nikon has sharp imaging and is widely used in landscape photography. Fried spinach in clear oil is your favorite!

There is no absolute good or bad. Consider the following options.

2, preferences: Canon's imaging soft point, Nikon's imaging sharp point. For example, if you take portraits at the same time, the facial skin taken by Canon may look smoother, and Nikon will take out spots and hair, depending on your preference. If you don't PS, it is estimated that many girls can't accept Nikon's face, and what you may need is this sharpness of hair.

3, accessories (referring to SLR users): bought the fuselage without a lens can not be used. Nikon has been an expert in optical products for many years, and the price of lenses is relatively cheap (excluding five new lenses scraped in June 2007, 5438+00). Nikon's supporting lenses are all "Nicole" lenses made by sister companies, which are original and my only love; Canon has high-tech product technology, and the L-head is an indispensable weapon for professional photography at present, and the price is certainly high. Canon's lens is also a self-made "Canon" lens with the same name, with first-class performance. In this regard, I suggest that you support the original factory distribution, regardless of the price. The key is to rest assured, the quality is guaranteed and the performance is good.

4. Surrounding environment (referring to SLR users): Now the price of SLR is very low, and ordinary users can afford it. Unless you are a professional photographer, if ordinary consumers mostly borrow some lenses and equipment from each other for fun. Because some of Nikon's equipment is not compatible with Canon's, it is sometimes convenient to consider what machines friends borrow from each other. In the end, there is no need to argue with each other. It is suggested to choose one and match it firmly.

5. Cost performance: Nikon and Canon are both old brands of digital SLR, and the current market price is very transparent. It makes sense that you get what you get at a price. According to personal economic ability, we should believe that market time is a test of quality. Just like a digital SLR put into the market, after a period of market test, some will fall and some will be firm, which can also prove some truth. Followed by advanced SLR: entry-level SLR, quasi-professional SLR, professional SLR. Of course, the price is higher and higher. If the economic conditions are good, it is recommended to buy an entry-level SLR directly at a price of 654.38+100000 Li. The kit here refers to the lens plus the fuselage, quasi-professional machine, which is more expensive, exceeding 654.38+100000, and the price of professional machine is 2.

Which is better? Only those suitable for your own use are good!

There is no difference between good and bad. It should be decided according to the subject matter of personal shooting, and the camera parameters should be adjusted and set according to the respective characteristics of Nikon or Canon. General photographers think that Nikon generally pays attention to scenery, while Canon pays attention to portraits, but it is not necessarily completely correct. There is not much difference between the photos taken by camera parameter setting and post-image adjustment.

Entry-level SLR can directly ignore these problems, because there is little difference between the two, but if the quality of entry-level SLR is better, Jani is better; Most of the mid-to-high-end models are Jani's, which is heavier than Canon's, because Jani's machine also has a zoom motor inside, except for the D4 D3X equipped with a flashlight, which increases the weight. Comfort Personally, I think Nikon pays more attention to the feel in design, with thicker and more delicate leather and a very close-fitting shape. It feels particularly comfortable to hold, but the biggest disadvantage is that the fuselage is easy to peel off after long-term use! Canon's high-end cameras have all been used, and some will shoot the middle finger. As for the personal habit of pressing buttons, Canon's turntable is very cool to use, and Nikon's direction keys are convenient to focus.

Canon cameras and Nikon cameras take almost the same pictures, and there is no difference between good and bad. It should be said that they each have their own advantages. The quality of taking pictures can only depend on the photographer himself, his understanding of the works taken, his artistic accomplishment and his control of the subject. As the saying goes, different people have different opinions. There is no shortage of beauty in the world, just the lack of eyes to find beauty. I wonder if my answer will help you.

The machines in Japan are all similar, but the style of the film is different. Please look at these two original films first and choose your favorite style.