What lenses surpass the "Wan Ye Essential Oil" 24-70 zoom lens?

This question is actually very interesting. Because your 24-70 is called "Ten Thousand Essential Oils". Who else can surpass it?

In terms of focal length coverage, 24-70 covers our commonly used focal lengths for landscapes, humanities, and close-ups of portraits. The constant aperture of maximum f/2.8 is the ultimate among zoom lenses. The lens material inside the lens is sufficient to ensure that whether it is telephoto or wide-angle, even the maximum aperture can ensure sufficient usable image quality. Generally speaking, the biggest disadvantage of using a large three-element lens is that it is too bulky, heavy, and expensive.

If we talk about which lenses can surpass lenses like 24-70, we can only say that different lenses have different positioning and different functions and uses. If we say that there are many cameras with focal lengths exceeding 24-70, such as 24- 120 lenses such as 28-300 have a wider focal range, but the aperture and internal optical quality are insufficient. If you compare the aperture value, the aperture value of an entry-level fixed-focus lens such as the 50 f1.8 that costs a few hundred yuan has already surpassed the f2.8 of the 24-70. But, I can’t zoom.

In fact, many people are looking forward to the advancement of technology. We can see a lens with the same range of 24-70 and a wider aperture. Indeed, there are. For example, the Canon RF mount 28-70f/2 lens is equally wide-angle to telephoto, and has a large aperture of constant f/2 that is comparable to a fixed-focus lens. In addition, the image quality in the evaluation is still very good. But please note that this lens actually has a lot of sacrifices. The wide-angle end has shrunk by 4mm. The weight and size have also subverted our understanding of mirrorless lenses. The price of nearly 20,000 yuan also rewrites the junior high. Yuan history. Some people may think that the 4mm difference in wide angle is nothing, but you will know the difference if you actually experience it.

Since it is a "Taiwan Balm", it means it is omnipotent. According to the meaning of this word, the 2470 can capture everything as a "Taiwan Balm". Naturally, no lens can surpass it. In fact, some people say that it is a "Taiwan Balm" lens, which may mean that it is highly practical. So there is also a generally recognized name, work head. 24-70/2.8 is a short to medium zoom lens, which is a must-have or indispensable in all major photography enthusiasts. It is basically owned by most photography enthusiasts. If you usually like to record something, take photos of your family, or take photos during travel, or during company meetings, leadership speeches, etc., it is really good to use this lens to take photos, and the use effect is good.

However, if you are a portrait photography enthusiast, or like to shoot landscapes, then the 2470 will seem useless. For portraits, it is certainly not as good as the other lens of Dasanyuan, the 70200, for landscapes. If so, it would definitely be inferior to 1635. Of course, this does not mean that this lens cannot take portraits. If you use it to take environmental portraits, it is quite good. Moreover, this lens has good image quality and a very smooth picture. It still has its advantages. Now that you have this lens, you can definitely do it. Fully developed. Another Canon 2470 with an aperture of 4.0 also has a macro function, which is very unique. If you like shooting macro, you can buy it.

Each lens has its own characteristics. There is really no way to judge whether it is good or bad. It just has different uses in different environments or themes. In terms of usage rate, there is no doubt that 24-105 24- 120 is more than 2470. The convenience of these two lenses is relatively the greatest, but it does not mean that these two lenses are the best. For example, when shooting sports, bird hunting, macro and other extreme subjects, these two lenses The lens alone is obviously not up to the task.

I haven’t found one yet. It’s less than 24-70 and is very usable. The most important thing about this focal length is that the image quality is very reliable!

Personally, I think the choice of lens depends on the subject of the photo. I have a 24-70, but when I use it to do humanistic street photography, when I raise the camera to a stranger, the other person will instinctively be wary. psychology. And it feels a bit heavy. For now, I just bring a small spittoon and no zoom, so I can think more and move more.

Unless your career requires it, entry-level players should not buy a universal zoom head first. This will only make you rely on the convenience of zoom and ignore the exercise of your mind and eyes. Of course, it doesn’t matter when your level reaches a certain level. Generally speaking, The level of photography is inversely proportional to the number of shutter clicks.

Tamron 18-400/5.6-6.3. From landscapes, portraits, to hunting birds, we can do everything. But don’t expect too much, the sharpness will not be very high, and the distortion will be larger at the wide angle and telephoto ends.

This focal length is irreplaceable, and it is almost the best at 2.8 aperture. Apart from strengthening anti-shake and coating, there is not much room for improvement. Perhaps the only lens that can surpass all lenses of this specification is the Canon RF28-70 f2 lens. With a larger aperture, it has completely surpassed its own EF and rf24-70 (see review for details). Of course, this also sacrifices the 4mm wide angle and portability, making it difficult to use as a camera lens and more like a professional portrait lens. One lens can handle the common focal lengths of 28, 35, 50, and 70, which is beyond the reach of the 2470. And although the price of 19,000 is indeed expensive, the price of NC's mirrorless 2470 is not cheap either. In the end, it is actually more expensive than a non-red circle lens.

For portraits, this lens is very cost-effective!